Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 951

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron

Open access
Oganov, Artem R., Chen, Jiuhua, Gatti, Carlo, Ma, Yanzhang, Ma, Yanming, Glass, Colin W., Liu, Zhenxian, Yu, Tony, Kurakevych, Oleksandr O., Solozhenko, Vladimir L.·2009·Nature

Abstract

Boron is an element of fascinating chemical complexity. Controversies have shrouded this element since its discovery was announced in 1808: the new ‘element’ turned out to be a compound containing less than 60–70% of boron, and it was not until 1909 that 99% pure boron was obtained. And although we now know of at least 16 polymorphs, the stable phase of boron is not yet experimentally established even at ambient conditions. Boron’s complexities arise from frustration: situated between metals and insulators in the periodic table, boron has only three valence electrons, which would favour metallicity, but they are sufficiently localized that insulating states emerge. However, this subtle balance between metallic and insulating states is easily shifted by pressure, temperature and impurities. Here we report the results of high-pressure experiments and ab initio evolutionary crystal structure predictions that explore the structural stability of boron under pressure and, strikingly, reveal a partially ionic high-pressure boron phase. This new phase is stable between 19 and 89 GPa, can be quenched to ambient conditions, and has a hitherto unknown structure (space group Pnnm, 28 atoms in the unit cell) consisting of icosahedral B12 clusters and B2 pairs in a NaCl-type arrangement. We find that the ionicity of the phase affects its electronic bandgap, infrared adsorption and dielectric constants, and that it arises from the different electronic properties of the B2 pairs and B12 clusters and the resultant charge transfer between them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07736

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 951

Metadata

Authors
Oganov, A. R., Chen, J., Gatti, C., Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Glass, C. W., Liu, Z., Yu, T., Kurakevych, O. O., & Solozhenko, V. L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
457
Issue
7231
Pages
863-867
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2133927870
Cited by
951
References
3
FWCI
33.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07736
The paper
Oganov, A. R., Chen, J., Gatti, C., Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Glass, C. W., Liu, Z., Yu, T., Kurakevych, O. O., & Solozhenko, V. L. (2009). Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.