Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas
Open accessAbstract
Visual working memory provides an essential link between perception and higher cognitive functions, allowing for the active maintenance of information about stimuli no longer in view. Research suggests that sustained activity in higher-order prefrontal, parietal, inferotemporal and lateral occipital areas supports visual maintenance, and may account for the limited capacity of working memory to hold up to 3-4 items. Because higher-order areas lack the visual selectivity of early sensory areas, it has remained unclear how observers can remember specific visual features, such as the precise orientation of a grating, with minimal decay in performance over delays of many seconds. One proposal is that sensory areas serve to maintain fine-tuned feature information, but early visual areas show little to no sustained activity over prolonged delays. Here we show that orientations held in working memory can be decoded from activity patterns in the human visual cortex, even when overall levels of activity are low. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and pattern classification methods, we found that activity patterns in visual areas V1-V4 could predict which of two oriented gratings was held in memory with mean accuracy levels upwards of 80%, even in participants whose activity fell to baseline levels after a prolonged delay. These orientation-selective activity patterns were sustained throughout the delay period, evident in individual visual areas, and similar to the responses evoked by unattended, task-irrelevant gratings. Our results demonstrate that early visual areas can retain specific information about visual features held in working memory, over periods of many seconds when no physical stimulus is present.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context, from objects presented in the periphery, and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived.
“For example, activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context [31, 32], from objects presented in the periphery [33], and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived [34, 35].”
From Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex (2014) · cites this paper as [34]
Eye movements are unlikely to have contributed to the decoding of imagined orientations.
“The current task design makes it unlikely that eye movements contributed to the decoding of imagined orientations.First, we trained the classifier on the independent localizer, during which participants had to perform a task at fixation.Second, the stimulus gratings were presented very briefly (200 ms), too short for systematic eye movement preparation and execution.Additionally, the relevant grat”
From Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex (2013) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 1,347
- Authors
- Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tong, Frank
- ORCID
- Tong, Frank
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-02-18
- Volume
- 458
- Issue
- 7238
- Pages
- 632-635
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2709809
- OpenAlex
- W1999110283
- Cited by
- 1,347
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 31.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vanderbilt University
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- National Eye Institute (R01EY017082)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- visual working memory, early visual cortex, orientation memory, pattern classification, sustained neural activity, delay period, memory maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review