Cited by 1,347Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural dynamics and brain function

Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas

Open access
Harrison, Stephenie A., Tong, Frank·2009·Nature

Abstract

Visual working memory provides an essential link between perception and higher cognitive functions, allowing for the active maintenance of information about stimuli no longer in view. Research suggests that sustained activity in higher-order prefrontal, parietal, inferotemporal and lateral occipital areas supports visual maintenance, and may account for the limited capacity of working memory to hold up to 3-4 items. Because higher-order areas lack the visual selectivity of early sensory areas, it has remained unclear how observers can remember specific visual features, such as the precise orientation of a grating, with minimal decay in performance over delays of many seconds. One proposal is that sensory areas serve to maintain fine-tuned feature information, but early visual areas show little to no sustained activity over prolonged delays. Here we show that orientations held in working memory can be decoded from activity patterns in the human visual cortex, even when overall levels of activity are low. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and pattern classification methods, we found that activity patterns in visual areas V1-V4 could predict which of two oriented gratings was held in memory with mean accuracy levels upwards of 80%, even in participants whose activity fell to baseline levels after a prolonged delay. These orientation-selective activity patterns were sustained throughout the delay period, evident in individual visual areas, and similar to the responses evoked by unattended, task-irrelevant gratings. Our results demonstrate that early visual areas can retain specific information about visual features held in working memory, over periods of many seconds when no physical stimulus is present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07832

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context, from objects presented in the periphery, and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived.

    “For example, activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context [31, 32], from objects presented in the periphery [33], and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived [34, 35].”

    From Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex (2014) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Eye movements are unlikely to have contributed to the decoding of imagined orientations.

    “The current task design makes it unlikely that eye movements contributed to the decoding of imagined orientations.First, we trained the classifier on the independent localizer, during which participants had to perform a task at fixation.Second, the stimulus gratings were presented very briefly (200 ms), too short for systematic eye movement preparation and execution.Additionally, the relevant grat”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 1,347

Authors
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Tong, Frank
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-02-18
Volume
458
Issue
7238
Pages
632-635
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1999110283
Cited by
1,347
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 55
FWCI
31.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY017082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
visual working memory, early visual cortex, orientation memory, pattern classification, sustained neural activity, delay period, memory maintenance
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review