Contamination of the asteroid belt by primordial trans-Neptunian objects
Abstract
The main asteroid belt, which inhabits a relatively narrow annulus approximately 2.1-3.3 au from the Sun, contains a surprising diversity of objects ranging from primitive ice-rock mixtures to igneous rocks. The standard model used to explain this assumes that most asteroids formed in situ from a primordial disk that experienced radical chemical changes within this zone. Here we show that the violent dynamical evolution of the giant-planet orbits required by the so-called Nice model leads to the insertion of primitive trans-Neptunian objects into the outer belt. This result implies that the observed diversity of the asteroid belt is not a direct reflection of the intrinsic compositional variation of the proto-planetary disk. The dark captured bodies, composed of organic-rich materials, would have been more susceptible to collisional evolution than typical main-belt asteroids. Their weak nature makes them a prodigious source of micrometeorites-sufficient to explain why most are primitive in composition and are isotopically different from most macroscopic meteorites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Nice model can explain the structure of the asteroid belt, some compositional variations therein, and the structure of Jupiter and Neptune's trojan populations.
“The Nice model can also explain not only the structure of the asteroid belt but also some of the compositional variations observed therein (Levison et al., 2009), along with the structure of both Jupiter and Neptune's trojan population (Morbidelli et al., 2005; Tsiganis et al., 2005; Sheppard and Trujillo, 2010).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Levison et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 292
- Authors
- Levison, H. F., Bottke, W. F., Gounelle, M., Morbidelli, A., Nesvorný, D., & Tsiganis, K.
- Affiliations
- Southwest Research Institute (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Levison, Harold F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 460
- Issue
- 7253
- Pages
- 364-366
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2093941502
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- asteroid belt, trans-Neptunian objects, Nice model, micrometeorites, collisional evolution, planetesimal formation, protoplanetary disks, isotopic heterogeneity, meteorite composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review