Cited by 148Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Saturn's largest ring

Verbiscer, Anne J., Skrutskie, Michael F., Hamilton, Douglas P.·2009·Nature

Abstract

Most planetary rings in the Solar System lie within a few radii of their host body, because at these distances gravitational accelerations inhibit satellite formation. The best known exceptions are Jupiter's gossamer rings and Saturn's E ring, broad sheets of dust that extend outward until they fade from view at five to ten planetary radii. Source satellites continuously supply the dust, which is subsequently lost in collisions or by radial transport. Here we report that Saturn has an enormous ring associated with its outer moon Phoebe, extending from at least 128R(S) to 207R(S) (Saturn's radius R(S) is 60,330 km). The ring's vertical thickness of 40R(S) matches the range of vertical motion of Phoebe along its orbit. Dynamical considerations argue that these ring particles span the Saturnian system from the main rings to the edges of interplanetary space. The ring's normal optical depth of approximately 2 x 10(-8) is comparable to that of Jupiter's faintest gossamer ring, although its particle number density is several hundred times smaller. Repeated impacts on Phoebe, from both interplanetary and circumplanetary particle populations, probably keep the ring populated with material. Ring particles smaller than centimetres in size slowly migrate inward and many of them ultimately strike the dark leading face of Iapetus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Phoebe ring around Saturn is not coplanar with the other rings but lies in the plane of Saturn's orbit.

    “In the case of the largest ring around Saturn, the Phoebe ring is not coplanar with the other rings (Verbiscer et al. 2009) but lies in the plane of Saturn's orbit.”
  • The Phoebe ring's non-coplanarity is due to the dominance of solar perturbations over the gravitational perturbation caused by the J2 contribution of Saturn's gravitational field.

    “This is due to the dominance of solar perturbations over the gravitational perturbation caused by the J 2 contribution of Saturn's gravitational field.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verbiscer, A. J., Skrutskie, M. F., & Hamilton, D. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Verbiscer, Anne J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-10
Volume
461
Issue
7267
Pages
1098-1100
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2021545548
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Saturn, Phoebe, outer ring, planetary rings, ring particle dynamics, dust ejection, ring optical depth, interplanetary dust, circumplanetary dust, Saturn E ring, ring particle size distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review