Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation

Open access
Chodavarapu, Ramakrishna K., Feng, Suhua, Bernatavichute, Yana V., Chen, Pao-Yang, Stroud, Hume, Yu, Yanchun, Hetzel, Jonathan A., Kuo, Frank, Kim, Jin, Cokus, Shawn J., Casero, David, Bernal, Maria, Huijser, Peter, Clark, Amander T., Krämer, Ute, Merchant, Sabeeha S., Zhang, Xiaoyu, Jacobsen, Steven E., Pellegrini, Matteo·2010·Nature

Abstract

Nucleosomes compact and regulate access to DNA in the nucleus, and are composed of approximately 147 bases of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer. Here we report a genome-wide nucleosome positioning analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana using massively parallel sequencing of mononucleosomes. By combining this data with profiles of DNA methylation at single base resolution, we identified 10-base periodicities in the DNA methylation status of nucleosome-bound DNA and found that nucleosomal DNA was more highly methylated than flanking DNA. These results indicate that nucleosome positioning influences DNA methylation patterning throughout the genome and that DNA methyltransferases preferentially target nucleosome-bound DNA. We also observed similar trends in human nucleosomal DNA, indicating that the relationships between nucleosomes and DNA methyltransferases are conserved. Finally, as has been observed in animals, nucleosomes were highly enriched on exons, and preferentially positioned at intron–exon and exon–intron boundaries. RNA polymerase II (Pol II) was also enriched on exons relative to introns, consistent with the hypothesis that nucleosome positioning regulates Pol II processivity. DNA methylation is also enriched on exons, consistent with the targeting of DNA methylation to nucleosomes, and suggesting a role for DNA methylation in exon definition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09147

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Chodavarapu, R. K., Feng, S., Bernatavichute, Y. V., Chen, P.-Y., Stroud, H., Yu, Y., Hetzel, J. A., Kuo, F., Kim, J., Cokus, S. J., Casero, D., Bernal, M., Huijser, P., Clark, A. T., Krämer, U., Merchant, S. S., Zhang, X., Jacobsen, S. E., & Pellegrini, M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-05-30
Volume
466
Issue
7304
Pages
388-392
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2077562677
Cited by
696
References
3
FWCI
32.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09147
The paper
Chodavarapu, R. K., Feng, S., Bernatavichute, Y. V., Chen, P.-Y., Stroud, H., Yu, Y., Hetzel, J. A., Kuo, F., Kim, J., Cokus, S. J., Casero, D., Bernal, M., Huijser, P., Clark, A. T., Krämer, U., Merchant, S. S., Zhang, X., Jacobsen, S. E., & Pellegrini, M. (2010). Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.