The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Bacteria have developed mechanisms to communicate and compete with one another in diverse environments. A new form of intercellular communication, contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI), was discovered recently in Escherichia coli. CDI is mediated by the CdiB/CdiA two-partner secretion (TPS) system. CdiB facilitates secretion of the CdiA ‘exoprotein’ onto the cell surface. An additional small immunity protein (CdiI) protects CDI+ cells from autoinhibition. The mechanisms by which CDI blocks cell growth and by which CdiI counteracts this growth arrest are unknown. Moreover, the existence of CDI activity in other bacteria has not been explored. Here we show that the CDI growth inhibitory activity resides within the carboxy-terminal region of CdiA (CdiA-CT), and that CdiI binds and inactivates cognate CdiA-CT, but not heterologous CdiA-CT. Bioinformatic and experimental analyses show that multiple bacterial species encode functional CDI systems with high sequence variability in the CdiA-CT and CdiI coding regions. CdiA-CT heterogeneity implies that a range of toxic activities are used during CDI. Indeed, CdiA-CTs from uropathogenic E. coli and the plant pathogen Dickeya dadantii have different nuclease activities, each providing a distinct mechanism of growth inhibition. Finally, we show that bacteria lacking the CdiA-CT and CdiI coding regions are unable to compete with isogenic wild-type CDI+ cells both in laboratory media and on a eukaryotic host. Taken together, these results suggest that CDI systems constitute an intricate immunity network with an important function in bacterial competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance: mechanisms and regulation
Caballero-Flores, G., Pickard, J. M., & Núñez, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00833-7 · Cited by 474
Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition
Koskiniemi, S., Lamoureux, J. G., Nikolakakis, K. C., t'Kint de Roodenbeke, C., Kaplan, M. D., Low, D. A., & Hayes, C. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1300627110 · Cited by 414
Self-citationMa, Z., Zuo, T., Frey, N., & Rangrez, A. Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01946-6 · Cited by 259
Bacteria deliver a microtubule-binding protein into mammalian cells to promote colonization
Costello, M. S., Neumann, B., Raimondi, M. W., Cuthbert, B. J., Holubová, J., Garza-Sánchez, F., Samad, A., Bumba, L., Torres, J. A., Holznecht, N., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adz2737 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aoki, S. K., Diner, E. J., de Roodenbeke, C. T., Burgess, B. R., Poole, S. J., Braaten, B. A., Jones, A. M., Webb, J. S., Hayes, C. S., Cotter, P. A., & Low, D. A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 468
- Issue
- 7322
- Pages
- 439-442
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1966688540
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09490
- The paper
- Aoki, S. K., Diner, E. J., de Roodenbeke, C. T., Burgess, B. R., Poole, S. J., Braaten, B. A., Jones, A. M., Webb, J. S., Hayes, C. S., Cotter, P. A., & Low, D. A. (2010). A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.