Hf–W–Th evidence for rapid growth of Mars and its status as a planetary embryo
Abstract
Terrestrial planets are thought to have formed through collisions between large planetary embryos of diameter ∼1,000-5,000 km. For Earth, the last of these collisions involved an impact by a Mars-size embryo that formed the Moon 50-150 million years (Myr) after the birth of the Solar System. Although model simulations of the growth of terrestrial planets can reproduce the mass and dynamical parameters of the Earth and Venus, they fall short of explaining the small size of Mars. One possibility is that Mars was a planetary embryo that escaped collision and merging with other embryos. To assess this idea, it is crucial to know Mars' accretion timescale, which can be investigated using the (182)Hf-(182)W decay system in shergottite-nakhlite-chassignite meteorites. Nevertheless, this timescale remains poorly constrained owing to a large uncertainty associated with the Hf/W ratio of the Martian mantle and as a result, contradicting timescales have been reported that range between 0 and 15 Myr (refs 6-10). Here we show that Mars accreted very rapidly and reached about half of its present size in only 1.8(+0.9)(-1.0) Myr or less, which is consistent with a stranded planetary embryo origin. We have found a well-defined correlation between the Th/Hf and (176)Hf/(177)Hf ratios in chondrites that reflects remobilization of Lu and Th during parent-body processes. Using this relationship, we estimate the Hf/W ratio in Mars' mantle to be 3.51 ± 0.45. This value is much more precise than previous estimates, which ranged between 2.6 and 5.0 (ref. 6), and lifts the large uncertainty that plagued previous estimates of the age of Mars. Our results also demonstrate that Mars grew before dissipation of the nebular gas when ∼100-km planetesimals, such as the parent bodies of chondrites, were still being formed. Mars' accretion occurred early enough to allow establishment of a magma ocean powered by decay of (26)Al.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mars formed very rapidly compared to Earth.
“Mars formed very rapidly compared to Earth (Dauphas & Pourmand 2011) and is smaller than predicted by standard formation models (Chambers & Wetherill 1998).”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Dauphas & Pourmand 2011
Cites
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · see citing works
THE Hf-W ISOTOPIC SYSTEM AND THE ORIGIN OF THE EARTH AND MOON
Jacobsen, S. B. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122614 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The origins and concentrations of water, carbon, nitrogen and noble gases on Earth
Marty, B. (2012) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.040 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Wordsworth, R. D. (2016) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012355 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
“Mars formed very rapidly compared to Earth (Dauphas & Pourmand 2011) and is smaller than predicted by standard formation models (Chambers & Wetherill 1998).”
BackgroundOutgassing History and Escape of the Martian Atmosphere and Water Inventory
Lammer, H., Chassefière, E., Karatekin, Ö., Morschhauser, A., Niles, P. B., Mousis, O., Odert, P., Möstl, U. V., Breuer, D., Dehant, V., et al. (2013) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9943-8 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“The (182)Hf-(182)W isotope system has also been applied to dating Mars (Dauphas and Pourmand, 2011).”
- Authors
- Dauphas, N., & Pourmand, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dauphas, N.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 473
- Issue
- 7348
- Pages
- 489-492
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2013173303
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Keywords
- planetary embryos, Martian mantle, chondrites, shergottites, nakhlites, chassignites, planetesimal formation, terrestrial planet formation, Moon formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review