The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A heteromeric Texas coral snake toxin targets acid-sensing ion channels to produce pain
Open accessAbstract
Natural products that elicit discomfort or pain represent invaluable tools for probing molecular mechanisms underlying pain sensation. Plant-derived irritants have predominated in this regard, but animal venoms have also evolved to avert predators by targeting neurons and receptors whose activation produces noxious sensations. As such, venoms provide a rich and varied source of small molecule and protein pharmacophores that can be exploited to characterize and manipulate key components of the pain-signalling pathway. With this in mind, here we perform an unbiased in vitro screen to identify snake venoms capable of activating somatosensory neurons. Venom from the Texas coral snake (Micrurus tener tener), whose bite produces intense and unremitting pain, excites a large cohort of sensory neurons. The purified active species (MitTx) consists of a heteromeric complex between Kunitz- and phospholipase-A2-like proteins that together function as a potent, persistent and selective agonist for acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), showing equal or greater efficacy compared with acidic pH. MitTx is highly selective for the ASIC1 subtype at neutral pH; under more acidic conditions (pH < 6.5), MitTx massively potentiates (>100-fold) proton-evoked activation of ASIC2a channels. These observations raise the possibility that ASIC channels function as coincidence detectors for extracellular protons and other, as yet unidentified, endogenous factors. Purified MitTx elicits robust pain-related behaviour in mice by activation of ASIC1 channels on capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibres. These findings reveal a mechanism whereby snake venoms produce pain, and highlight an unexpected contribution of ASIC1 channels to nociception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synergistic strategies of predominant toxins in snake venoms
Xiong, S., & Huang, C. (2018) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.02.004 · Cited by 78
Toxin synergism in snake venoms
Laustsen, A. H. (2016) · Toxin Reviews · doi:10.1080/15569543.2016.1220397 · Cited by 65
Tikhonova, T. B., Nagaeva, E. I., Barygin, O. I., Potapieva, N. N., Bolshakov, K. V., & Tikhonov, D. B. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.08.018 · Cited by 30
Cobra Venom: From Envenomation Syndromes to Therapeutic Innovations
Lafnoune, A., Chbel, A., Darkaoui, B., Nait Irahal, I., & Oukkache, N. (2024) · International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.1007/s10989-024-10646-2 · Cited by 9
Furukawa, Y., & Tagashira, I. (2023) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00424-023-02817-9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohlen, C. J., Chesler, A. T., Sharif-Naeini, R., Medzihradszky, K. F., Zhou, S., King, D., Sánchez, E. E., Burlingame, A. L., Basbaum, A. I., & Julius, D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 479
- Issue
- 7373
- Pages
- 410-414
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2005960433
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.