Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,626

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural population dynamics during reaching

Open access
Churchland, Mark M., Cunningham, John P., Kaufman, Matthew T., Foster, Justin D., Nuyujukian, Paul, Ryu, Stephen I., Shenoy, Krishna V.·2012·Nature

Abstract

Most theories of motor cortex have assumed that neural activity represents movement parameters. This view derives from what is known about primary visual cortex, where neural activity represents patterns of light. Yet it is unclear how well the analogy between motor and visual cortex holds. Single-neuron responses in motor cortex are complex, and there is marked disagreement regarding which movement parameters are represented. A better analogy might be with other motor systems, where a common principle is rhythmic neural activity. Here we find that motor cortex responses during reaching contain a brief but strong oscillatory component, something quite unexpected for a non-periodic behaviour. Oscillation amplitude and phase followed naturally from the preparatory state, suggesting a mechanistic role for preparatory neural activity. These results demonstrate an unexpected yet surprisingly simple structure in the population response. This underlying structure explains many of the confusing features of individual neural responses. It has long been thought that individual neurons in the motor and premotor cortex are tuned for parameters of movements such as direction. But despite decades of work, the exact nature of the represented parameters is still unclear, as are the mechanisms through which such representations could support the complex movements made in the course of every day life. Here, Churchland et al. propose an alternative theory — that population dynamics could underlie motor control. They show that reaching movements are associated with oscillatory population activity in the monkey motor cortex, despite there being no periodic component to this behaviour. The amplitude and phase of the oscillation followed naturally from the preceding state, suggesting a role for preparatory neural activity in reaching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11129

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,626

Metadata

Authors
Churchland, M. M., Cunningham, J. P., Kaufman, M. T., Foster, J. D., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I., & Shenoy, K. V.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-06-03
Volume
487
Issue
7405
Pages
51-56
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1974803102
Cited by
1,626
References
4
FWCI
29.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural population dynamics during reaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11129
The paper
Churchland, M. M., Cunningham, J. P., Kaufman, M. T., Foster, J. D., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I., & Shenoy, K. V. (2012). Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.