Cited by 347Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain functionMotor Control and Adaptation

Activity in motor-sensory projections reveals distributed coding in somatosensation

Open access
Petreanu, Leopoldo, Gutnisky, Diego A., Huber, Daniel, Xu, Ning-long, O’Connor, Dan H., Tian, Lin, Looger, Loren, Svoboda, Karel·2012·Nature

Abstract

Cortical-feedback projections to primary sensory areas terminate most heavily in layer 1 (L1) of the neocortex, where they make synapses with tuft dendrites of pyramidal neurons. L1 input is thought to provide ‘contextual’ information, but the signals transmitted by L1 feedback remain uncharacterized. In the rodent somatosensory system, the spatially diffuse feedback projection from vibrissal motor cortex (vM1) to vibrissal somatosensory cortex (vS1, also known as the barrel cortex) may allow whisker touch to be interpreted in the context of whisker position to compute object location. When mice palpate objects with their whiskers to localize object features, whisker touch excites vS1 and later vM1 in a somatotopic manner. Here we use axonal calcium imaging to track activity in vM1-->vS1 afferents in L1 of the barrel cortex while mice performed whisker-dependent object localization. Spatially intermingled individual axons represent whisker movements, touch and other behavioural features. In a subpopulation of axons, activity depends on object location and persists for seconds after touch. Neurons in the barrel cortex thus have information to integrate movements and touches of multiple whiskers over time, key components of object identification and navigation by active touch.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11321

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The motor system sends corollary discharge to sensory regions to compensate for the expected sensory consequences of motor commands, and there is extensive evidence for movement-related modulations of sensory neurons, part of which has been traced back to motor and cerebellar cortex.

    “It has long been suspected that the motor system sends 'corollary discharge' to sensory regions to compensate for the expected sensory consequences of motor commands, and there is now extensive evidence for movement-related modulations of sensory neurons, part of which has been traced back to motor and cerebellar cortex [58][59][60].”

    From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [59]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 347

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. de Kock, C. P. J. & Sakmann, B. Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type specific. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16446-16450 (2009).
  2. [18]18. Varga, Z., Jia, H., Sakmann, B. & Konnerth, A. Dendritic coding of multiple sensory inputs in single cortical neurons in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15420-15425 (2011).

Authors
Petreanu, L., Gutnisky, D. A., Huber, D., Xu, N.-L., O’Connor, D. H., Tian, L., Looger, L., & Svoboda, K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Svoboda, Karel
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-08-26
Volume
489
Issue
7415
Pages
299-303
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2005725359
Cited by
347
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council (FT100100502)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1004575)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
barrel cortex, somatosensory cortex, whisker movement, object localization, distributed coding, contextual information, layer 1, active touch, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Movement, Neural Pathways, Physical Stimulation, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Vibrissae, Calcium Signaling, Feedback, Physiological, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review