The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates
Open accessAbstract
The geometric aspects of quantum mechanics are emphasized most prominently by the concept of geometric phases, which are acquired whenever a quantum system evolves along a path in Hilbert space, that is, the space of quantum states of the system. The geometric phase is determined only by the shape of this path and is, in its simplest form, a real number. However, if the system has degenerate energy levels, then matrix-valued geometric state transformations, known as non-Abelian holonomies—the effect of which depends on the order of two consecutive paths—can be obtained. They are important, for example, for the creation of synthetic gauge fields in cold atomic gases or the description of non-Abelian anyon statistics. Moreover, there are proposals to exploit non-Abelian holonomic gates for the purposes of noise-resilient quantum computation. In contrast to Abelian geometric operations, non-Abelian ones have been observed only in nuclear quadrupole resonance experiments with a large number of spins, and without full characterization of the geometric process and its non-commutative nature. Here we realize non-Abelian non-adiabatic holonomic quantum operations on a single, superconducting, artificial three-level atom by applying a well-controlled, two-tone microwave drive. Using quantum process tomography, we determine fidelities of the resulting non-commuting gates that exceed 95 per cent. We show that two different quantum gates, originating from two distinct paths in Hilbert space, yield non-equivalent transformations when applied in different orders. This provides evidence for the non-Abelian character of the implemented holonomic quantum operations. In combination with a non-trivial two-quantum-bit gate, our method suggests a way to universal holonomic quantum computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colloquium : Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms
Dalibard, J., Gerbier, F., Juzeliūnas, G., & Öhberg, P. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1523 · Cited by 2,033
Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M. (1999) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00803-8 · Cited by 1,006
Cited by
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,307
Entanglement Generation in Superconducting Qubits Using Holonomic Operations
Egger, D. J., Ganzhorn, M., Salis, G., Fuhrer, A., Müller, P., Barkoutsos, P. K., Moll, N., Tavernelli, I., & Filipp, S. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.014017 · Cited by 91
Self-citationSpin–orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities
Ma, L. B., Li, S. L., Fomin, V. M., Hentschel, M., Götte, J. B., Yin, Y., Jorgensen, M. R., & Schmidt, O. G. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10983 · Cited by 88
Non-Abelian generalizations of the Hofstadter model: spin–orbit-coupled butterfly pairs
Yang, Y., Zhen, B., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2020) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-020-00384-7 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdumalikov Jr, A. A., Fink, J. M., Juliusson, K., Pechal, M., Berger, S., Wallraff, A., & Filipp, S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 496
- Issue
- 7446
- Pages
- 482-485
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1990997025
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12010
- The paper
- Abdumalikov Jr, A. A., Fink, J. M., Juliusson, K., Pechal, M., Berger, S., Wallraff, A., & Filipp, S. (2013). Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.