The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new anode material for oxygen evolution in molten oxide electrolysis
Open accessAbstract
Molten oxide electrolysis (MOE) is an electrometallurgical technique that enables the direct production of metal in the liquid state from oxide feedstock, and compared with traditional methods of extractive metallurgy offers both a substantial simplification of the process and a significant reduction in energy consumption. MOE is also considered a promising route for mitigation of CO2 emissions in steelmaking, production of metals free of carbon, and generation of oxygen for extra-terrestrial exploration. Until now, MOE has been demonstrated using anode materials that are consumable (graphite for use with ferro-alloys and titanium) or unaffordable for terrestrial applications (iridium for use with iron). To enable metal production without process carbon, MOE requires an anode material that resists depletion while sustaining oxygen evolution. The challenges for iron production are threefold. First, the process temperature is in excess of 1,538 degrees Celsius (ref. 10). Second, under anodic polarization most metals inevitably corrode in such conditions. Third, iron oxide undergoes spontaneous reduction on contact with most refractory metals and even carbon. Here we show that anodes comprising chromium-based alloys exhibit limited consumption during iron extraction and oxygen evolution by MOE. The anode stability is due to the formation of an electronically conductive solid solution of chromium(iii) and aluminium oxides in the corundum structure. These findings make practicable larger-scale evaluation of MOE for the production of steel, and potentially provide a key material component enabling mitigation of greenhouse-gas emissions while producing metal of superior metallurgical quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bataille, C., Åhman, M., Neuhoff, K., Nilsson, L. J., Fischedick, M., Lechtenböhmer, S., Solano-Rodriquez, B., Denis-Ryan, A., Stiebert, S., Waisman, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107 · Cited by 680
Recyclable metal fuels for clean and compact zero-carbon power
Bergthorson, J. M. (2018) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.001 · Cited by 435
Shahabuddin, M., Brooks, G., & Rhamdhani, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136391 · Cited by 298
Sustainability through alloy design: Challenges and opportunities
Cann, J. L., De Luca, A., Dunand, D. C., Dye, D., Miracle, D. B., Oh, H. S., Olivetti, E. A., Pollock, T. M., Poole, W. J., Yang, R., et al. (2021) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100722 · Cited by 191
A parametric sizing model for Molten Regolith Electrolysis reactors to produce oxygen on the Moon
Schreiner, S. S., Sibille, L., Dominguez, J. A., & Hoffman, J. A. (2016) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.01.006 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Allanore, A., Yin, L., & Sadoway, D. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 497
- Issue
- 7449
- Pages
- 353-356
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1964216370
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new anode material for oxygen evolution in molten oxide electrolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12134
- The paper
- Allanore, A., Yin, L., & Sadoway, D. R. (2013). A new anode material for oxygen evolution in molten oxide electrolysis. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.