Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices

Open access
Ponomarenko, L. A., Gorbachev, R. V., Yu, G. L., Elias, D. C., Jalil, R., Patel, A. A., Mishchenko, A., Mayorov, A. S., Woods, C. R., Wallbank, J. R., Mucha-Kruczynski, M., Piot, B. A., Potemski, M., Grigorieva, I. V., Novoselov, K. S., Guinea, F., Fal’ko, V. I., Geim, A. K.·2013·Nature

Abstract

Superlattices have attracted great interest because their use may make it possible to modify the spectra of two-dimensional electron systems and, ultimately, create materials with tailored electronic properties. In previous studies (see, for example, refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), it proved difficult to realize superlattices with short periodicities and weak disorder, and most of their observed features could be explained in terms of cyclotron orbits commensurate with the superlattice. Evidence for the formation of superlattice minibands (forming a fractal spectrum known as Hofstadter’s butterfly) has been limited to the observation of new low-field oscillations and an internal structure within Landau levels. Here we report transport properties of graphene placed on a boron nitride substrate and accurately aligned along its crystallographic directions. The substrate’s moiré potential acts as a superlattice and leads to profound changes in the graphene’s electronic spectrum. Second-generation Dirac points appear as pronounced peaks in resistivity, accompanied by reversal of the Hall effect. The latter indicates that the effective sign of the charge carriers changes within graphene’s conduction and valence bands. Strong magnetic fields lead to Zak-type cloning of the third generation of Dirac points, which are observed as numerous neutrality points in fields where a unit fraction of the flux quantum pierces the superlattice unit cell. Graphene superlattices such as this one provide a way of studying the rich physics expected in incommensurable quantum systems and illustrate the possibility of controllably modifying the electronic spectra of two-dimensional atomic crystals by varying their crystallographic alignment within van der Waals heterostuctures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12187

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,327

Metadata

Authors
Ponomarenko, L. A., Gorbachev, R. V., Yu, G. L., Elias, D. C., Jalil, R., Patel, A. A., Mishchenko, A., Mayorov, A. S., Woods, C. R., Wallbank, J. R., Mucha-Kruczynski, M., Piot, B. A., Potemski, M., Grigorieva, I. V., Novoselov, K. S., Guinea, F., Fal’ko, V. I., & Geim, A. K.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-05
Volume
497
Issue
7451
Pages
594-597
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2087863452
Cited by
1,327
References
4
FWCI
54.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12187
The paper
Ponomarenko, L. A., Gorbachev, R. V., Yu, G. L., Elias, D. C., Jalil, R., Patel, A. A., Mishchenko, A., Mayorov, A. S., Woods, C. R., Wallbank, J. R., Mucha-Kruczynski, M., Piot, B. A., Potemski, M., Grigorieva, I. V., Novoselov, K. S., Guinea, F., Fal’ko, V. I., & Geim, A. K. (2013). Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.