Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability
Abstract
The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) drives substantial variability in rainfall, severe weather, agricultural production, ecosystems and disease in many parts of the world. Given that further human-forced changes in the Earth's climate system seem inevitable, the possibility exists that the character of ENSO and its impacts might change over the coming century. Although this issue has been investigated many times during the past 20 years, there is very little consensus on future changes in ENSO, apart from an expectation that ENSO will continue to be a dominant source of year-to-year variability. Here we show that there are in fact robust projected changes in the spatial patterns of year-to-year ENSO-driven variability in both surface temperature and precipitation. These changes are evident in the two most recent generations of climate models, using four different scenarios for CO2 and other radiatively active gases. By the mid- to late twenty-first century, the projections include an intensification of both El-Niño-driven drying in the western Pacific Ocean and rainfall increases in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific. Experiments with an Atmospheric General Circulation Model reveal that robust projected changes in precipitation anomalies during El Niño years are primarily determined by a nonlinear response to surface global warming. Uncertain projected changes in the amplitude of ENSO-driven surface temperature variability have only a secondary role. Projected cha…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies found a stronger rainfall response to ENSO SST variability even if ENSO SST variability itself does not change.
“consistent with findings by previous studies of a stronger rainfall response to ENSO SST variability even if ENSO SST variability itself does not change 2-4 .”
From Increased ENSO sea surface temperature variability under four IPCC emission scenarios (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 448
- Authors
- Power, S., Delage, F., Chung, C., Kociuba, G., & Keay, K.
- Affiliations
- Bureau of Meteorology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Power, Scott
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 502
- Issue
- 7472
- Pages
- 541-545
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2047294871
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 24.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- ENSO, rainfall variability, global warming, surface temperature change, climate model ensembles, CO2 emission scenarios
- MeSH terms
- Geography, Pacific Ocean, Rain, Temperature, Global Warming, El Nino-Southern Oscillation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review