Cited by 448Climate variability and modelsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability

Power, Scott, Delage, François, Chung, Christine, Kociuba, Greg, Keay, Kevin·2013·Nature

Abstract

The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) drives substantial variability in rainfall, severe weather, agricultural production, ecosystems and disease in many parts of the world. Given that further human-forced changes in the Earth's climate system seem inevitable, the possibility exists that the character of ENSO and its impacts might change over the coming century. Although this issue has been investigated many times during the past 20 years, there is very little consensus on future changes in ENSO, apart from an expectation that ENSO will continue to be a dominant source of year-to-year variability. Here we show that there are in fact robust projected changes in the spatial patterns of year-to-year ENSO-driven variability in both surface temperature and precipitation. These changes are evident in the two most recent generations of climate models, using four different scenarios for CO2 and other radiatively active gases. By the mid- to late twenty-first century, the projections include an intensification of both El-Niño-driven drying in the western Pacific Ocean and rainfall increases in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific. Experiments with an Atmospheric General Circulation Model reveal that robust projected changes in precipitation anomalies during El Niño years are primarily determined by a nonlinear response to surface global warming. Uncertain projected changes in the amplitude of ENSO-driven surface temperature variability have only a secondary role. Projected cha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12580

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found a stronger rainfall response to ENSO SST variability even if ENSO SST variability itself does not change.

    “consistent with findings by previous studies of a stronger rainfall response to ENSO SST variability even if ENSO SST variability itself does not change 2-4 .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 448

Authors
Power, S., Delage, F., Chung, C., Kociuba, G., & Keay, K.
Affiliations
Bureau of Meteorology (AU)
Corresponding author
Power, Scott
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-10
Volume
502
Issue
7472
Pages
541-545
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2047294871
Cited by
448
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
ENSO, rainfall variability, global warming, surface temperature change, climate model ensembles, CO2 emission scenarios
MeSH terms
Geography, Pacific Ocean, Rain, Temperature, Global Warming, El Nino-Southern Oscillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review