Two independent transcription initiation codes overlap on vertebrate core promoters
Open accessAbstract
A core promoter is a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site (TSS) that integrates regulatory inputs and recruits general transcription factors to initiate transcription. The nature and causative relationship of the DNA sequence and chromatin signals that govern the selection of most TSSs by RNA polymerase II remain unresolved. Maternal to zygotic transition represents the most marked change of the transcriptome repertoire in the vertebrate life cycle. Early embryonic development in zebrafish is characterized by a series of transcriptionally silent cell cycles regulated by inherited maternal gene products: zygotic genome activation commences at the tenth cell cycle, marking the mid-blastula transition. This transition provides a unique opportunity to study the rules of TSS selection and the hierarchy of events linking transcription initiation with key chromatin modifications. We analysed TSS usage during zebrafish early embryonic development at high resolution using cap analysis of gene expression, and determined the positions of H3K4me3-marked promoter-associated nucleosomes. Here we show that the transition from the maternal to zygotic transcriptome is characterized by a switch between two fundamentally different modes of defining transcription initiation, which drive the dynamic change of TSS usage and promoter shape. A maternal-specific TSS selection, which requires an A/T-rich (W-box) motif, is replaced with a zygotic TSS selection grammar characterized by broader patterns of dinucleotide enrichments, precisely aligned with the first downstream (+1) nucleosome. The developmental dynamics of the H3K4me3-marked nucleosomes reveal their DNA-sequence-associated positioning at promoters before zygotic transcription and subsequent transcription-independent adjustment to the final position downstream of the zygotic TSS. The two TSS-defining grammars coexist, often physically overlapping, in core promoters of constitutively expressed genes to enable their expression in the two regulatory environments. The dissection of overlapping core promoter determinants represents a framework for future studies of promoter structure and function across different regulatory contexts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CAGE-seq detects differently regulated transcription initiation events within the same core promoter and can accurately detect alternative promoters.
“CAGE-seq also detects differently regulated transcription initiation events within the same core promoter14,15, and thus, it can accurately detect alternative promoters.”
From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Barski, A., Cuddapah, S., Cui, K., Roh, T.-Y., Schones, D. E., Wang, Z., Wei, G., Chepelev, I., & Zhao, K. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009 · Cited by 6,845 · see citing works
Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution
Carninci, P., Sandelin, A., Lenhard, B., Katayama, S., Shimokawa, K., Ponjavic, J., Semple, C. A. M., Taylor, M. S., Engström, P. G., Frith, M. C., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1789 · Cited by 1,350 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- [1]D’Alessio JA Wright KJ Tjian R Shifting Players and Paradigms in Cell-Specific Transcription Molecular Cell 2009 36 924 931 20064459 PMC2807468
- [2]Kadonaga JT Perspectives on the RNA polymerase II core promoter Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2011 1 40 51 23801666 PMC3695423
- [3]Mathavan S Lee S Mak A Transcriptome Analysis of Zebrafish Embryogenesis Using Microarrays PLoS Genet 2005 1 e29 PMC1193535 16132083
- [4]Tadros W Lipshitz HD The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts Development 2009 136 3033 3042 19700615
- [5]Vastenhouw NL Chromatin signature of embryonic pluripotency is established during genome activation Nature 2010 464 922 926 20336069 PMC2874748
- [6]Lindeman LC Prepatterning of Developmental Gene Expression by Modified Histones before Zygotic Genome Activation Developmental Cell 2011 21 993 1004 22137762
- [7]Kane DA Kimmel CB The zebrafish midblastula transition Development 1993 119 447 456 8287796
- [8]Shiraki T Cap analysis gene expression for high-throughput analysis of transcriptional starting point and identification of promoter usage Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2003 100 15776 15781 14663149 PMC307644
- [11]Lenhard B Sandelin A Carninci P Metazoan promoters: emerging characteristics and insights into transcriptional regulation Nature Reviews Genetics 2012 13 233 245 22392219
- [12]Venters BJ Pugh BF Genomic organization of human transcription initiation complexes Nature 2013 502 53 58 24048476 PMC4018585
- [13]Nepal C Dynamic regulation of the transcription initiation landscape at single nucleotide resolution during vertebrate embryogenesis Genome Research 2013 23 1938 1950 24002785 PMC3814893
- [14]Giraldez AJ Zebrafish MiR-430 Promotes Deadenylation and Clearance of Maternal mRNAs Science 2006 312 75 79 16484454
- [15]Ponjavic J Transcriptional and structural impact of TATA-initiation site spacing in mammalian core promoters Genome Biology 2006 7 R78 16916456 PMC1779604
- [16]Segal E A genomic code for nucleosome positioning Nature 2006 442 772 778 16862119 PMC2623244
- [17]Ioshikhes I Hosid S Pugh BF Variety of genomic DNA patterns for nucleosome positioning Genome Research 2011 21 1863 1871 21750105 PMC3205571
- [18]Segal E Widom J What controls nucleosome positions? Trends in Genetics 2009 25 335 343 19596482 PMC2810357
- [19]Rhee HS Pugh BF Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes Nature 2012 483 295 301 22258509 PMC3306527
- [20]Rach EA Transcription Initiation Patterns Indicate Divergent Strategies for Gene Regulation at the Chromatin Level PLoS Genet 2011 7 e1001274 21249180 PMC3020932
- [21]Cairns BR The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters Nature 2009 461 193 198 19741699
- [22]Deaton AM Bird A CpG islands and the regulation of transcription Genes & Development 2011 25 1010 1022 21576262 PMC3093116
- [23]Thomson JP CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1 Nature 2010 464 1082 1086 20393567 PMC3730110
- [24]Fenouil R CpG islands and GC content dictate nucleosome depletion in a transcription-independent manner at mammalian promoters Genome Research 2012 22 2399 2408 23100115 PMC3514669
- [25]Nozaki T Tight associations between transcription promoter type and epigenetic variation in histone positioning and modification BMC Genomics 2011 12 416 21846408 PMC3170308
- [26]Bártfai R TBP2, a Vertebrate-Specific Member of the TBP Family, Is Required in Embryonic Development of Zebrafish Current Biology 2004 14 593 598 15062100
- [27]Akhtar W Veenstra G TBP2 is a substitute for TBP in Xenopus oocyte transcription BMC Biol 2009 7 45 19650908 PMC2731028
- [28]Lauberth SM H3K4me3 Interactions with TAF3 Regulate Preinitiation Complex Assembly and Selective Gene Activation Cell 2013 152 1021 1036 23452851 PMC3588593
- [29]Zaugg JB Luscombe NM A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast Genome Research 2012 22 84 94 21930892 PMC3246209
- [30]Davis W Jr. Schultz RM Developmental Change in TATA-Box Utilization during Preimplantation Mouse Development Developmental Biology 2000 218 275 283 10656769
- [31]Langmead B Trapnell C Pop M Salzberg SL Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome Genome Biology 2009 10 R25 19261174 PMC2690996
- [32]Kodzius R CAGE: cap analysis of gene expression Nature Methods 2006 3 211 222 16489339
- [33]Balwierz PJ Methods for analyzing deep sequencing expression data: constructing the human and mouse promoterome with deepCAGE data Genome Biology 2009 10 R79 19624849 PMC2728533
- [35]Gentleman RC Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics Genome Biology 2004 5 R80 15461798 PMC545600
- [36]Toronen P Kolehmainen M Wong G Castren E Analysis of gene expression data using self-organizing maps FEBS Letters 1999 451 142 146 10371154
- [37]Portales-Casamar E JASPAR 2010: the greatly expanded open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles Nucleic Acids Research 2009 38 D105 D110 19906716 PMC2808906
- [38]Bailey TL Elkan C Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers 1994 2 28 36 Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 7584402
- [39]Abe G Suster ML Kawakami K Detrich H William W. M Zon LI The Zebrafish: Genetics, Genomics and Informatics 2011 104 23 49 Academic Press
- [40]Gehrig J Automated high-throughput mapping of promoter-enhancer interactions in zebrafish embryos Nature Methods 2009 6 911 916 19898487
- [41]Higashijima S-I Okamoto H Ueno N Hotta Y Eguchi G High-Frequency Generation of Transgenic Zebrafish Which Reliably Express GFP in Whole Muscles or the Whole Body by Using Promoters of Zebrafish Origin Developmental Biology 1997 192 289 299 9441668
- [42]Ferg M Large scale- and functional analysis for the requirement of TBP-function in early zebrafish development PhD dissertation 2008 Heidelberg University http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/8920
- [43]Ferg M The TATA-binding protein regulates maternal mRNA degradation and differential zygotic transcription in zebrafish EMBO J 2007 26 3945 3956 17703193 PMC1950726
- [44]Soler E A systems approach to analyze transcription factors in mammalian cells Methods 2011 53 151 162 20705139
- [45]Zhang Y Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biology 2008 9 R137 18798982 PMC2592715
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transcriptional cofactors display specificity for distinct types of core promoters
Haberle, V., Arnold, C. D., Pagani, M., Rath, M., Schernhuber, K., & Stark, A. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1210-7 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationUniversal promoter scanning by Pol II during transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Qiu, C., Jin, H., Vvedenskaya, I., Llenas, J. A., Zhao, T., Malik, I., Visbisky, A. M., Schwartz, S. L., Cui, P., Čabart, P., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02040-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Nepal, C., & Andersen, J. B. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38272-4 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Haberle, V., Li, N., Hadzhiev, Y., Plessy, C., Previti, C., Nepal, C., Gehrig, J., Dong, X., Akalin, A., Suzuki, A. M., van IJcken, W. F. J., Armant, O., Ferg, M., Strähle, U., Carninci, P., Müller, F., & Lenhard, B.
- Affiliations
- Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- RIKEN (JP)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Carninci, Piero
- Müller, Ferenc
- Lenhard, Boris
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-02-16
- Volume
- 507
- Issue
- 7492
- Pages
- 381-385
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC4820030
- OpenAlex
- W2077173342
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- transcription start sites, maternal-to-zygotic transition, core promoter, zebrafish, zygotic genome activation, midblastula transition, H3K4me3, nucleosome positioning, oocyte-to-embryo transition, RNA polymerase II
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Female, Histones, Methylation, Mothers, Nucleosomes, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Zebrafish, Zygote, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Transcription Initiation Site, Transcriptome, Transcription Initiation, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review