Atallah et al. reply
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GABAergic inhibition controls the sensitivity of V1 neurons in rodents and cats by specifically adjusting their response gain without altering local selectivity or input gain.
“GABAergic inhibition controls the sensitivity of V1 neurons in rodents and cats by specifically adjusting their response gain without altering local selectivity or input gain2,68,69,101–104.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Atallah, B. V., Scanziani, M., & Carandini, M.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carandini, Matteo
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-04-02
- Volume
- 508
- Issue
- 7494
- Pages
- E3-E3
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2065623491
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Interneurons, Parvalbumins, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
