The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural basis for stop codon recognition in eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Termination of protein synthesis occurs when a translating ribosome encounters one of three universally conserved stop codons: UAA, UAG or UGA. Release factors recognize stop codons in the ribosomal A-site to mediate release of the nascent chain and recycling of the ribosome. Bacteria decode stop codons using two separate release factors with differing specificities for the second and third bases. By contrast, eukaryotes rely on an evolutionarily unrelated omnipotent release factor (eRF1) to recognize all three stop codons. The molecular basis of eRF1 discrimination for stop codons over sense codons is not known. Here we present cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures at 3.5–3.8 Å resolution of mammalian ribosomal complexes containing eRF1 interacting with each of the three stop codons in the A-site. Binding of eRF1 flips nucleotide A1825 of 18S ribosomal RNA so that it stacks on the second and third stop codon bases. This configuration pulls the fourth position base into the A-site, where it is stabilized by stacking against G626 of 18S rRNA. Thus, eRF1 exploits two rRNA nucleotides also used during transfer RNA selection to drive messenger RNA compaction. In this compacted mRNA conformation, stop codons are favoured by a hydrogen-bonding network formed between rRNA and essential eRF1 residues that constrains the identity of the bases. These results provide a molecular framework for eukaryotic stop codon recognition and have implications for future studies on the mechanisms of canonical and premature translation termination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MolProbity : all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography
Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909042073 · Cited by 14,115
RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination
Scheres, S. H. W. (2012) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 · Cited by 5,446
Rosenthal, P. B., & Henderson, R. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · Cited by 2,416
Cited by
The ASC-1 complex disassembles collided ribosomes
Juszkiewicz, S., Speldewinde, S. H., Wan, L., Svejstrup, J. Q., & Hegde, R. S. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.006 · Cited by 206
Self-citationDetailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines
Xia, X. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9070734 · Cited by 201
Záhonová, K., Kostygov, A. Y., Ševčíková, T., Yurchenko, V., & Eliáš, M. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.064 · Cited by 113
Kraushar, M. L., Krupp, F., Harnett, D., Turko, P., Ambrozkiewicz, M. C., Sprink, T., Imami, K., Günnigmann, M., Zinnall, U., Vieira-Vieira, C. H., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.037 · Cited by 49
Sawyer, E. B., Phelan, J. E., Clark, T. G., & Cortes, T. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108695 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, A., Shao, S., Murray, J., Hegde, R. S., & Ramakrishnan, V.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 7566
- Pages
- 493-496
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1195318580
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.