Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 850

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere

Open access
Tröstl, Jasmin, Chuang, Wayne K., Gordon, Hamish, Heinritzi, Martin, Yan, Chao, Molteni, Ugo, Ahlm, Lars, Frege, Carla, Bianchi, Federico, Wagner, Robert, Simon, Mario, Lehtipalo, Katrianne, Williamson, Christina, Craven, Jill S., Duplissy, Jonathan, Adamov, Alexey, Almeida, Joao, Bernhammer, Anne-Kathrin, Breitenlechner, Martin, Brilke, Sophia, Dias, Antònio, Ehrhart, Sebastian, Flagan, Richard C., Franchin, Alessandro, Fuchs, Claudia, Guida, Roberto, Gysel, Martin, Hansel, Armin, Hoyle, Christopher R., Jokinen, Tuija, Junninen, Heikki, Kangasluoma, Juha, Keskinen, Helmi, Kim, Jaeseok, Krapf, Manuel, Kürten, Andreas, Laaksonen, Ari, Lawler, Michael, Leiminger, Markus, Mathot, Serge, Möhler, Ottmar, Nieminen, Tuomo, Onnela, Antti, Petäjä, Tuukka, Piel, Felix M., Miettinen, Pasi, Rissanen, Matti P., Rondo, Linda, Sarnela, Nina, Schobesberger, Siegfried, Sengupta, Kamalika, Sipilä, Mikko, Smith, James N., Steiner, Gerhard, Tomè, Antònio, Virtanen, Annele, Wagner, Andrea C., Weingartner, Ernest, Wimmer, Daniela, Winkler, Paul M., Ye, Penglin, Carslaw, Kenneth S., Curtius, Joachim, Dommen, Josef, Kirkby, Jasper, Kulmala, Markku, Riipinen, Ilona, Worsnop, Douglas R., Donahue, Neil M., Baltensperger, Urs·2016·Nature

Abstract

About half of present-day cloud condensation nuclei originate from atmospheric nucleation, frequently appearing as a burst of new particles near midday 1. Atmospheric observations show that the growth rate of new particles often accelerates when the diameter of the particles is between one and ten nanometres 2,3. In this critical size range, new particles are most likely to be lost by coagulation with pre-existing particles 4, thereby failing to form new cloud condensation nuclei that are typically 50 to 100 nanometres across. Sulfuric acid vapour is often involved in nucleation but is too scarce to explain most subsequent growth 5,6, leaving organic vapours as the most plausible alternative, at least in the planetary boundary layer 7,8,9,10. Although recent studies 11,12,13 predict that low-volatility organic vapours contribute during initial growth, direct evidence has been lacking. The accelerating growth may result from increased photolytic production of condensable organic species in the afternoon 2, and the presence of a possible Kelvin (curvature) effect, which inhibits organic vapour condensation on the smallest particles (the nano-Köhler theory)2,14, has so far remained ambiguous. Here we present experiments performed in a large chamber under atmospheric conditions that investigate the role of organic vapours in the initial growth of nucleated organic particles in the absence of inorganic acids and bases such as sulfuric acid or ammonia and amines, respectively. Using data from the same set of experiments, it has been shown 15 that organic vapours alone can drive nucleation. We focus on the growth of nucleated particles and find that the organic vapours that drive initial growth have extremely low volatilities (saturation concentration less than 10−4.5 micrograms per cubic metre). As the particles increase in size and the Kelvin barrier falls, subsequent growth is primarily due to more abundant organic vapours of slightly higher volatility (saturation concentrations of 10−4.5 to 10−0.5 micrograms per cubic metre). We present a particle growth model that quantitatively reproduces our measurements. Furthermore, we implement a parameterization of the first steps of growth in a global aerosol model and find that concentrations of atmospheric cloud concentration nuclei can change substantially in response, that is, by up to 50 per cent in comparison with previously assumed growth rate parameterizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature18271

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 850

Metadata

Authors
Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K., Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler, M., Leiminger, M., Mathot, S., Möhler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Tomè, A., Virtanen, A., Wagner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., & Baltensperger, U.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
533
Issue
7604
Pages
527-531
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2402991992
Cited by
850
References
0
FWCI
45.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature18271
The paper
Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K., Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., . . . Baltensperger, U. (2016). The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.