Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate de novo design of hyperstable constrained peptides

Open access
Bhardwaj, Gaurav, Mulligan, Vikram Khipple, Bahl, Christopher D., Gilmore, Jason M., Harvey, Peta J., Cheneval, Olivier, Buchko, Garry W., Pulavarti, Surya V. S. R. K., Kaas, Quentin, Eletsky, Alexander, Huang, Po-Ssu, Johnsen, William A., Greisen, Per Jr, Rocklin, Gabriel J., Song, Yifan, Linsky, Thomas W., Watkins, Andrew, Rettie, Stephen A., Xu, Xianzhong, Carter, Lauren P., Bonneau, Richard, Olson, James M., Coutsias, Evangelos, Correnti, Colin E., Szyperski, Thomas, Craik, David J., Baker, David·2016·Nature

Abstract

Naturally occurring, pharmacologically active peptides constrained with covalent crosslinks generally have shapes that have evolved to fit precisely into binding pockets on their targets. Such peptides can have excellent pharmaceutical properties, combining the stability and tissue penetration of small-molecule drugs with the specificity of much larger protein therapeutics. The ability to design constrained peptides with precisely specified tertiary structures would enable the design of shape-complementary inhibitors of arbitrary targets. Here we describe the development of computational methods for accurate de novo design of conformationally restricted peptides, and the use of these methods to design 18–47 residue, disulfide-crosslinked peptides, a subset of which are heterochiral and/or N–C backbone-cyclized. Both genetically encodable and non-canonical peptides are exceptionally stable to thermal and chemical denaturation, and 12 experimentally determined X-ray and NMR structures are nearly identical to the computational design models. The computational design methods and stable scaffolds presented here provide the basis for development of a new generation of peptide-based drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19791

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Bhardwaj, G., Mulligan, V. K., Bahl, C. D., Gilmore, J. M., Harvey, P. J., Cheneval, O., Buchko, G. W., Pulavarti, S. V. S. R. K., Kaas, Q., Eletsky, A., Huang, P.-S., Johnsen, W. A., Greisen, P. J., Rocklin, G. J., Song, Y., Linsky, T. W., Watkins, A., Rettie, S. A., Xu, X., Carter, L. P., Bonneau, R., Olson, J. M., Coutsias, E., Correnti, C. E., Szyperski, T., Craik, D. J., & Baker, D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-09-14
Volume
538
Issue
7625
Pages
329-335
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2520613901
Cited by
440
References
7
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate de novo design of hyperstable constrained peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature19791
The paper
Bhardwaj, G., Mulligan, V. K., Bahl, C. D., Gilmore, J. M., Harvey, P. J., Cheneval, O., Buchko, G. W., Pulavarti, S. V. S. R. K., Kaas, Q., Eletsky, A., Huang, P.-S., Johnsen, W. A., Greisen, P. J., Rocklin, G. J., Song, Y., Linsky, T. W., Watkins, A., Rettie, S. A., Xu, X., . . . Baker, D. (2016). Accurate de novo design of hyperstable constrained peptides. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.