Cited by 174Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Transplanted embryonic neurons integrate into adult neocortical circuits

Falkner, Susanne, Grade, Sofia, Dimou, Leda, Conzelmann, Karl-Klaus, Bonhoeffer, Tobias, Götz, Magdalena, Hübener, Mark·2016·Nature

Abstract

The ability of the adult mammalian brain to compensate for neuronal loss caused by injury or disease is very limited. Transplantation aims to replace lost neurons, but the extent to which new neurons can integrate into existing circuits is unknown. Here, using chronic in vivo two-photon imaging, we show that embryonic neurons transplanted into the visual cortex of adult mice mature into bona fide pyramidal cells with selective pruning of basal dendrites, achieving adult-like densities of dendritic spines and axonal boutons within 4-8 weeks. Monosynaptic tracing experiments reveal that grafted neurons receive area-specific, afferent inputs matching those of pyramidal neurons in the normal visual cortex, including topographically organized geniculo-cortical connections. Furthermore, stimulus-selective responses refine over the course of many weeks and finally become indistinguishable from those of host neurons. Thus, grafted neurons can integrate with great specificity into neocortical circuits that normally never incorporate new neurons in the adult brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature20113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 174

Authors
Falkner, S., Grade, S., Dimou, L., Conzelmann, K.-K., Bonhoeffer, T., Götz, M., & Hübener, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Max-von-Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Götz, Magdalena
  • Hübener, Mark
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-10-26
Volume
539
Issue
7628
Pages
248-253
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2542896373
Cited by
174
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 5
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-12-07)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
visual cortex, pyramidal neurons, dendritic spine maturation, monosynaptic tracing, neuronal regeneration, brain injury repair, adult neurogenesis
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Axons, Cell Differentiation, Efferent Pathways, Embryo, Mammalian, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Presynaptic Terminals, Pyramidal Cells, Neocortex, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Cell Tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review