Cited by 54Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

PLD3 gene and processing of APP

Fazzari, Pietro, Horre, Katrien, Arranz, Amaia M., Frigerio, Carlo Sala, Saito, Takashi, Saido, Takaomi C., De Strooper, Bart·2017·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature21030

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ARMs, but not IRMs, are enriched for known AD risk genes such as Apoe, Trem2, Tyrobp (DAP12), Ctsb, Ctsd, H2-Eb1, and Pld3.

    “gene enrichment analysis indicates that ARMs, but not IRMs, are enriched for known AD risk genes such as Apoe, Trem2, Tyrobp (DAP12), Ctsb, Ctsd, H2-Eb1, and Pld3”

    From The Major Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease: Age, Sex, and Genes Modulate the Microglia Response to Aβ Plaques (2019) · cites this paper as Fazzari et al., 2017

    The paper’s opening passage (p. 1) reports that PLD3 variants have been linked to increased Alzheimer’s disease risk, supporting Pld3 as one example in the list. It does not report gene-enrichment analysis, compare ARMs with IRMs, or establish the claimed enrichment of the listed genes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 54

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]5. Nixon, R. a. The role of autophagy in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Med. 19, 983997 (2013).

Authors
Fazzari, P., Horre, K., Arranz, A. M., Frigerio, C. S., Saito, T., Saido, T. C., & De Strooper, B.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-01
Volume
541
Issue
7638
Pages
E1-E2
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2580530941
Cited by
54
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17116)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26290019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
PLD3, Alzheimer's disease, APP processing, APP, rare coding variants, genetic risk, autophagy, lysosomal proteolysis, endosomal-lysosomal system, axonal transport, conditional knockout mice, knock-in mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review