Cited by 324Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors

Open access
Penn, A. C., Zhang, C. L., Georges, F., Royer, L., Breillat, C., Hosy, E., Petersen, J. D., Humeau, Y. +1 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) of excitatory synaptic transmission has long been considered a cellular correlate for learning and memory. Early LTP (less than 1 h) had initially been explained either by presynaptic increases in glutamate release or by direct modification of postsynaptic AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptor function. Compelling models have more recently proposed that synaptic potentiation can occur by the recruitment of additional postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs), sourced either from an intracellular reserve pool by exocytosis or from nearby extra-synaptic receptors pre-existing on the neuronal surface. However, the exact mechanism through which synapses can rapidly recruit new AMPARs during early LTP remains unknown. In particular, direct evidence for a pivotal role of AMPAR surface diffusion as a trafficking mechanism in synaptic plasticity is still lacking. Here, using AMPAR immobilization approaches, we show that interfering with AMPAR surface diffusion markedly impairs synaptic potentiation of Schaffer collaterals and commissural inputs to the CA1 area of the mouse hippocampus in cultured slices, acute slices and in vivo. Our data also identify distinct contributions of various AMPAR trafficking routes to the temporal profile of synaptic potentiation. In addition, AMPAR immobilization in vivo in the dorsal hippocampus inhibited fear conditioning, indicating that AMPAR diffusion is important for the early phase of contextual learning. Therefore, our results provide a direct demonstration that the recruitment of new receptors to synapses by surface diffusion is a critical mechanism for the expression of LTP and hippocampal learning. Since AMPAR surface diffusion is dictated by weak Brownian forces that are readily perturbed by protein-protein interactions, we anticipate that this fundamental trafficking mechanism will be a key target for modulating synaptic potentiation and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23658

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interfering with the surface diffusion of AMPARs by receptor cross-linking markedly impairs LTP.

    “Consistent with this result is the finding that interfering with the surface diffusion of AMPARs by receptor cross-linking markedly impairs LTP (345–347).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [345]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 324

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Takeuchi T Duszkiewicz AJ Morris RG The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis: encoding, storage and persistence Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014 369 20130288 PMC3843897 24298167
  2. [2]Nicoll RA A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation Neuron 2017 93 281 290 28103477
  3. [3]MacDougall MJ Fine A The expression of long-term potentiation: reconciling the preists and the postivists Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013 369 20130135 PMC3843868 24298138
  4. [4]Padamsey Z Emptage N Two sides to long-term potentiation: a view towards reconciliation Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013 369 20130154 PMC3843885 24298155
  5. [5]Yang Y Calakos N Presynaptic long-term plasticity Front Synaptic Neurosci 2013 5 8 24146648 PMC3797957
  6. [6]Lisman J Yasuda R Raghavachari S Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation Nat Rev Neurosci 2012 13 169 182 22334212 PMC4050655
  7. [7]Lu W Roche KW Posttranslational regulation of AMPA receptor trafficking and function Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012 22 470 479 22000952 PMC3279598
  8. [8]Granger AJ Nicoll RA Expression mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation: a postsynaptic view, 10 years on Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014 369 20130136 PMC3843869 24298139
  9. [9]Huganir RL Nicoll RA AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years Neuron 2013 80 704 717 24183021 PMC4195488
  10. [10]Opazo P CaMKII Triggers the Diffusional Trapping of Surface AMPARs through Phosphorylation of Stargazin Neuron 2010 67 239 252 20670832
  11. [11]Chater TE Goda Y The role of AMPA receptors in postsynaptic mechanisms of synaptic plasticity Front Cell Neurosci 2014 8 401 25505875 PMC4245900
  12. [13]Bliss TV Collingridge GL Expression of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in the hippocampus: bridging the divide Mol Brain 2013 6 5 23339575 PMC3562207
  13. [14]Lledo PM Zhang X Sudhof TC Malenka RC Nicoll RA Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation Science 1998 279 399 403 9430593
  14. [17]Wu D Postsynaptic synaptotagmins mediate AMPA receptor exocytosis during LTP Nature 2017 544 316 321 28355182 PMC5734942
  15. [19]Granger AJ Shi Y Lu W Cerpas M Nicoll RA LTP requires a reserve pool of glutamate receptors independent of subunit type Nature 2013 493 495 500 23235828 PMC3998843
  16. [21]Howarth M Takao K Hayashi Y Ting AY Targeting quantum dots to surface proteins in living cells with biotin ligase PNAS 2005 102 7583 7588 15897449 PMC1129026
  17. [22]Williams K Modulation and block of ion channels: a new biology of polyamines Cell Signal 1997 9 1 13 9067625
  18. [23]Patterson MA Szatmari EM Yasuda R AMPA receptors are exocytosed in stimulated spines and adjacent dendrites in a Ras-ERK-dependent manner during long-term potentiation PNAS 2010 107 15951 15956 20733080 PMC2936631
  19. [24]Liu X Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall Nature 2012 484 381 385 22441246 PMC3331914
  20. [25]McHugh TJ Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network Science 2007 317 94 99 17556551
  21. [26]Takemoto K Optical inactivation of synaptic AMPA receptors erases fear memory Nat Biotechnol 2017 35 38 47 27918547
  22. [27]Kessels HW Malinow R Synaptic AMPA receptor plasticity and behavior Neuron 2009 61 340 350 19217372 PMC3917551
  23. [28]Whitlock JR Heynen AJ Shuler MG Bear MF Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus Science 2006 313 1093 1097 16931756
  24. [29]Giannone G Dynamic superresolution imaging of endogenous proteins on living cells at ultra-high density Biophysical journal 2010 99 1303 1310 20713016 PMC2920718
  25. [30]Howarth M Takao K Hayashi Y Ting AY Targeting quantum dots to surface proteins in living cells with biotin ligase PNAS 2005 102 7583 7588 15897449 PMC1129026
  26. [31]Jia Z Enhanced LTP in mice deficient in the AMPA receptor GluR2 Neuron 1996 17 945 956 8938126
  27. [32]Phair RD Gorski SA Misteli T Measurement of dynamic protein binding to chromatin in vivo, using photobleaching microscopy Methods in enzymology 2004 375 393 414 14870680
  28. [33]Penn AC Balik A Wozny C Cais O Greger IH Activity-mediated AMPA receptor remodeling, driven by alternative splicing in the ligand-binding domain Neuron 2012 76 503 510 23141062 PMC3500689
  29. [34]Rathenberg J Nevian T Witzemann V High-efficiency transfection of individual neurons using modified electrophysiology techniques J Neurosci Methods 2003 126 91 98 12788505
  30. [35]Potier M Temporal Memory and Its Enhancement by Estradiol Requires Surface Dynamics of Hippocampal CA1 N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors Biol Psychiatry 2016 79 9 734 745 26321020

Authors
Penn, A. C., Zhang, C. L., Georges, F., Royer, L., Breillat, C., Hosy, E., Petersen, J. D., Humeau, Y., & Choquet, D.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Choquet, D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-09
Volume
549
Issue
7672
Pages
384-388
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2735674872
Cited by
324
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 5
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-0004)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M020746/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
diffusion, AMPA receptor trafficking, long-term potentiation, contextual learning, fear conditioning, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity, Schaffer collaterals, CA1, glutamate receptors, memory formation, dorsal hippocampus, excitatory synaptic transmission, glutamate release, postsynaptic receptors
MeSH terms
Animals, Avidin, Biotin, Cell Membrane, Conditioning, Classical, Cross-Linking Reagents, Diffusion, Fear, Female, Hippocampus, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Synaptic Transmission, Synapses, Long-Term Potentiation, Receptors, AMPA, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review