The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle
Open accessAbstract
Nitrification, the oxidation of ammonia (NH3) via nitrite (NO2−) to nitrate (NO3−), is a key process of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. For decades, ammonia and nitrite oxidation were thought to be separately catalysed by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA), and by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB). The recent discovery of complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) in the NOB genus Nitrospira, which alone convert ammonia to nitrate, raised questions about the ecological niches in which comammox Nitrospira successfully compete with canonical nitrifiers. Here we isolate a pure culture of a comammox bacterium, Nitrospira inopinata, and show that it is adapted to slow growth in oligotrophic and dynamic habitats on the basis of a high affinity for ammonia, low maximum rate of ammonia oxidation, high growth yield compared to canonical nitrifiers, and genomic potential for alternative metabolisms. The nitrification kinetics of four AOA from soil and hot springs were determined for comparison. Their surprisingly poor substrate affinities and lower growth yields reveal that, in contrast to earlier assumptions, AOA are not necessarily the most competitive ammonia oxidizers present in strongly oligotrophic environments and that N. inopinata has the highest substrate affinity of all analysed ammonia oxidizer isolates except the marine AOA Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1 (ref. 3). These results suggest a role for comammox organisms in nitrification under oligotrophic and dynamic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Cited by
Nitrification and nitrifiers in acidic soils
Li, Y., Chapman, S. J., Nicol, G. W., & Yao, H. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.023 · Cited by 523
Nitrification in agricultural soils: impact, actors and mitigation
Beeckman, F., Motte, H., & Beeckman, T. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.014 · Cited by 448
Hink, L., Gubry-Rangin, C., Nicol, G. W., & Prosser, J. I. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-017-0025-5 · Cited by 406
Controls and Adaptive Management of Nitrification in Agricultural Soils
Norton, J., & Ouyang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01931 · Cited by 404
Roots, P., Wang, Y., Rosenthal, A. F., Griffin, J. S., Sabba, F., Petrovich, M., Yang, F., Kozak, J. A., Zhang, H., & Wells, G. F. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.060 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Kits, K. D., Sedlacek, C. J., Lebedeva, E. V., Han, P., Bulaev, A., Pjevac, P., Daebeler, A., Romano, S., Albertsen, M., Stein, L. Y., Daims, H., & Wagner, M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Volume
- 549
- Issue
- 7671
- Pages
- 269-272
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2747182905
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature23679
- The paper
- Kits, K. D., Sedlacek, C. J., Lebedeva, E. V., Han, P., Bulaev, A., Pjevac, P., Daebeler, A., Romano, S., Albertsen, M., Stein, L. Y., Daims, H., & Wagner, M. (2017). Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.