The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Open accessAbstract
Quantum computers can be used to address electronic-structure problems and problems in materials science and condensed matter physics that can be formulated as interacting fermionic problems, problems which stretch the limits of existing high-performance computers. Finding exact solutions to such problems numerically has a computational cost that scales exponentially with the size of the system, and Monte Carlo methods are unsuitable owing to the fermionic sign problem. These limitations of classical computational methods have made solving even few-atom electronic-structure problems interesting for implementation using medium-sized quantum computers. Yet experimental implementations have so far been restricted to molecules involving only hydrogen and helium. Here we demonstrate the experimental optimization of Hamiltonian problems with up to six qubits and more than one hundred Pauli terms, determining the ground-state energy for molecules of increasing size, up to BeH 2. We achieve this result by using a variational quantum eigenvalue solver (eigensolver) with efficiently prepared trial states that are tailored specifically to the interactions that are available in our quantum processor, combined with a compact encoding of fermionic Hamiltonians and a robust stochastic optimization routine. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by applying it to a problem of quantum magnetism, an antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in an external magnetic field. In all cases, we find agreement between our experiments and numerical simulations using a model of the device with noise. Our results help to elucidate the requirements for scaling the method to larger systems and for bridging the gap between key problems in high-performance computing and their implementation on quantum hardware.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pauli strings that commute qubit-wise, i.e. the Pauli operators on each qubit commute, can be measured at the same time (Kandala et al. , 2017; McClean et al. , 2016).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Kandala et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Aclass of hardware-efficient ansätze (see Fig. 3(b)) has been proposed to accommodate device constraints (Kandala et al. , 2017).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Kandala et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“While the quantum analog of #P , #BQP , has been defined and has been shown to contain important physical problems, it turns out to be of equal complexity to #P 67 .”
From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“The most prominent example of this class of algorithms relevant for electronic structure calculations is the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), which presents a variational (and thus heuristic) algorithm to upper bounding the ground state energy problem.[126][127][128]”
From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
Citations
Cites
Szabó, A., & Ostlund, N. S. (1982) · Cited by 6,239
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation
Spall, J. C. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.119632 · Cited by 2,283
The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 · Cited by 2,227
A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.4028 · Cited by 1,789
Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies
Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J., & Head-Gordon, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113479 · Cited by 1,418
Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits
Temme, K., Bravyi, S., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationScalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies
O’Malley, P. J. J., Babbush, R., Kivlichan, I. D., Romero, J., McClean, J. R., Barends, R., Kelly, J., Roushan, P., Tranter, A., Ding, N., et al. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031007 · Cited by 1,059
Bravyi, S. B., & Kitaev, A. Y. (2002) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 · Cited by 1,033
Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
Lanyon, B. P., Whitfield, J. D., Gillett, G. G., Goggin, M. E., Almeida, M. P., Kassal, I., Biamonte, J. D., Mohseni, M., Powell, B. J., Barbieri, M., et al. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.483 · Cited by 796
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,010
Nondestructive discrimination of a new family of highly entangled states in IBM quantum computer
Satyajit, S., Srinivasan, K., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1976-9 · Cited by 39
Construction of Green's functions on a quantum computer: Quasiparticle spectra of molecules
Kosugi, T., & Matsushita, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012330 · Cited by 45
Optimal Quantum Control with Poor Statistics
Sauvage, F., & Mintert, F. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020322 · Cited by 45
Kowalski, K. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.032804 · Cited by 40
Variational quantum eigensolver for dynamic correlation functions
Chen, H., Nusspickel, M., Tilly, J., & Booth, G. H. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.032405 · Cited by 42
Beyond the standard quantum limit for parametric amplification of broadband signals
Renger, M., Pogorzalek, S., Chen, Q., Nojiri, Y., Inomata, K., Nakamura, Y., Partanen, M., Marx, A., Gross, R., Deppe, F., et al. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00495-y · Cited by 39
Quantum Architecture Search with Meta‐Learning
He, Z., Chen, C., Li, L., Zheng, S., & Situ, H. (2022) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100134 · Cited by 44
Is all-electrical silicon quantum computing feasible in the long term?
Ferraro, E., & Prati, E. (2020) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126352 · Cited by 38
Sureshbabu, S. H., Sajjan, M., Oh, S., & Kais, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00294 · Cited by 39
Koridon, E., Yalouz, S., Senjean, B., Buda, F., O’Brien, T. E., & Visscher, L. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033127 · Cited by 44
Variational quantum approximate support vector machine with inference transfer
Park, S., Park, D. K., & Rhee, J. K. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29495-y · Cited by 40
Quantum Phase Recognition via Quantum Kernel Methods
Wu, Y., Wu, B., Wang, J. B., & Yuan, X. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-04-17-981 · Cited by 45
Shkolnikov, V. O., Mayhall, N. J., Economou, S. E., & Barnes, E. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-06-12-1040 · Cited by 57
NAPA: Intermediate-Level Variational Native-Pulse Ansatz for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Liang, Z., Cheng, J., Ren, H., Wang, H., Hua, F., Song, Z., Ding, Y., Chong, F. T., Han, S., Qian, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3355277 · Cited by 58
Quantum Kitchen Sinks: An algorithm for machine learning on near-term quantum computersPreprint
Wilson, C. M., Otterbach, J., Tezak, N., Smith, R., Polloreno, A., Karalekas, P. J., Heidel, S., Alam, M., Crooks, G. E., & Silva, M. P. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08321 · Cited by 68
Generalized Quantum Assisted Simulator
Haug, T., & Bharti, K. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.14737 · Cited by 38
Variational quantum evolution equation solver
Leong, F. Y., Ewe, W.-B., & Koh, D. E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14906-3 · Cited by 44
Optimized Quantum Phase Estimation for Simulating Electronic States in Various Energy Regimes
Kang, C., Bauman, N. P., Krishnamoorthy, S., & Kowalski, K. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00577 · Cited by 41
Bonsai Algorithm: Grow Your Own Fermion-to-Qubit Mappings
Miller, A., Zimborás, Z., Knecht, S., Maniscalco, S., & García-Pérez, G. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030314 · Cited by 54
Toward convergence of effective-field-theory simulations on digital quantum computers
Shehab, O., Landsman, K. A., Nam, Y., Zhu, D., Linke, N. M., Keesan, M., Pooser, R. C., & Monroe, C. R. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062319 · Cited by 40
From the Jaynes–Cummings model to non-abelian gauge theories: a guided tour for the quantum engineer
Kasper, V., Juzeliūnas, G., Lewenstein, M., Jendrzejewski, F., & Zohar, E. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abb961 · Cited by 37
Pirhooshyaran, M., & Tamás Terlaky, B. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-021-00051-z · Cited by 37
Stabilizing multiple topological fermions on a quantum computer
Koh, J. M., Tai, T., Phee, Y. H., Ng, W. E., & Lee, C. H. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00527-1 · Cited by 40
Software-Hardware Co-Optimization for Computational Chemistry on Superconducting Quantum Processors
Li, G., Shi, Y., & Javadi-Abhari, A. (2021) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/isca52012.2021.00070 · Cited by 40
Tamiya, S., & Yamasaki, H. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00592-6 · Cited by 37
Gocho, S., Nakamura, H., Kanno, S., Gao, Q., Kobayashi, T., Inagaki, T., & Hatanaka, M. (2023) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-023-00965-1 · Cited by 41
Reference-State Error Mitigation: A Strategy for High Accuracy Quantum Computation of Chemistry
Lolur, P., Skogh, M., Dobrautz, W., Warren, C., Biznárová, J., Osman, A., Tancredi, G., Wendin, G. P., Bylander, J., & Rahm, M. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00807 · Cited by 42
Toward Trainability of Quantum Neural Networks
Zhang, K., Hsieh, M.-H., Liu, L., & Tao, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.06258 · Cited by 36
Pei, Z. (2024) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102334 · Cited by 37
Error detection on quantum computers improving the accuracy of chemical calculations
Urbánek, M., Nachman, B. P., & de Jong, W. A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022427 · Cited by 42
Towards simulation of the dynamics of materials on quantum computers
Oftelie, L. B., Liu, K., Krishnamoorthy, A., Linker, T., Geng, Y., Shebib, D., Fukushima, S., Shimojo, F., Kalia, R. K., Nakano, A., et al. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.184305 · Cited by 36
Ryabinkin, I. G., Izmaylov, A. F., & Genin, S. N. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abda8e · Cited by 39
Tilly, J., Jones, G. A., Chen, H., Wossnig, L., & Grant, E. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.062425 · Cited by 43
New trends in quantum machine learning (a)
Buffoni, L., & Caruso, F. (2020) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/132/60004 · Cited by 38
Variational quantum algorithm with information sharing
Self, C. N., Khosla, K. E., Smith, A. W. R., Sauvage, F., Haynes, P. D., Knolle, J., Mintert, F., & Kim, M. S. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00452-9 · Cited by 40
Bauman, N. P., Chládek, J., Veis, L., Pittner, J., & Kowalski, K. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf602 · Cited by 38
Adaptive job and resource management for the growing quantum cloud
Ravi, G. S., Smith, K. N., Murali, P., & Chong, F. T. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce52317.2021.00047 · Cited by 46
Quantum readout error mitigation via deep learning
Kim, J., Oh, B., Chong, Y., Hwang, E. H., & Park, D. K. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac7b3d · Cited by 39
TimeStitch: Exploiting Slack to Mitigate Decoherence in Quantum Circuits
Smith, K. N., Ravi, G. S., Murali, P., Baker, J. M., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3548778 · Cited by 54
Variational Quantum Pulse Learning
Liang, Z., Wang, H., Cheng, J., Ding, Y., Ren, H., Gao, Z., Hu, Z., Boning, D. S., Qian, X., Han, S., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00078 · Cited by 44
Classical simulations of noisy variational quantum circuits
Fontana, E., Rudolph, M. S., Duncan, R., Rungger, I., & Cîrstoiu, C. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00955-1 · Cited by 81
Hardware-efficient bosonic quantum error-correcting codes based on symmetry operators
Niu, M. Y., Chuang, I. L., & Shapiro, J. H. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.032323 · Cited by 39
Selected topics of quantum computing for nuclear physics*
Zhang, D.-B., Xing, H., Yan, H., Wang, E., & Zhu, S.-L. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd761 · Cited by 38
Approximate Solutions of Combinatorial Problems via Quantum Relaxations
Fuller, B., Hadfield, C. F., Glick, J. R., Imamichi, T., Itoko, T., Thompson, R. J., Jiao, Y., Kagele, M., Blom, A. W., Raymond, R., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3421294 · Cited by 35
Self-citationHigh Dimensional Quantum Machine Learning With Small Quantum Computers
Marshall, S. C., Gyurik, C., & Dunjko, V. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-08-09-1078 · Cited by 35
Du, Y., Huang, T., You, S., Hsieh, M.-H., & Tao, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 35
Error statistics and scalability of quantum error mitigation formulas
Qin, D., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00707-7 · Cited by 38
Quantum Computing Techniques for Multi-knapsack Problems
Awasthi, A., Bär, F., Doetsch, J. A., Ehm, H., Erdmann, M., Hess, M., Klepsch, J., Limacher, P. A., Luckow, A., Niedermeier, C. A., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37963-5_19 · Cited by 34
Realization of higher-order topological lattices on a quantum computer
Koh, J. M., Tai, T., & Lee, C. H. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49648-5 · Cited by 46
Advancements in superconducting quantum computing
Jiang, Y.-Y., Deng, C., Fan, H., Li, B.-Y., Sun, L., Tan, X., Wang, W., Xue, G., Yan, F., Yu, H., et al. (2025) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf246 · Cited by 42
QuCumber: wavefunction reconstruction with neural networks
Beach, M. J. S., Vlugt, I. J. S. D., Golubeva, A., Huembeli, P., Kulchytskyy, B., Luo, X., Melko, R. G., Merali, E., & Torlai, G. (2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.1.009 · Cited by 42
Bootstrapping quantum process tomography via a perturbative ansatz
Govia, L. C. G., Ribeill, G. J., Ristè, D., Ware, M., & Krovi, H. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14873-1 · Cited by 36
Zhang, F., Gomes, N., Berthusen, N., Orth, P. P., Wang, C.-Z., Ho, K.-M., & Yao, Y.-X. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013039 · Cited by 34
Ab initio molecular dynamics on quantum computers
Fedorov, D. A., Otten, M., Gray, S. K., & Alexeev, Y. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0046930 · Cited by 35
Neural-network variational quantum algorithm for simulating many-body dynamics
Lee, C., Patil, P., Zhang, S., & Hsieh, C. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023095 · Cited by 35
Quantum circuit design methodology for multiple linear regression
Dutta, S., Suau, A., Dutta, S., Roy, S., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2020) · IET Quantum Communication · doi:10.1049/iet-qtc.2020.0013 · Cited by 38
Han, J., Wu, J., Wang, Y., Xia, Y., Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032402 · Cited by 34
Decision Diagrams for Quantum Measurements with Shallow Circuits
Hillmich, S., Hadfield, C. F., Raymond, R., Mezzacapo, A., & Wille, R. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce52317.2021.00018 · Cited by 34
Self-citationStructural risk minimization for quantum linear classifiers
Gyurik, C., Vreumingen, V. D., & Dunjko, V. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-01-13-893 · Cited by 34
A bibliometric analysis of quantum computing literature: mapping and evidences from scopus
Wang, J., Shen, L., & Zhou, W. (2021) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1963429 · Cited by 37
Unitary Selective Coupled-Cluster Method
Fedorov, D. A., Alexeev, Y., Gray, S. K., & Otten, M. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-02-703 · Cited by 38
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithm for semidefinite programming
Bharti, K., Haug, T., Vedral, V., & Kwek, L. C. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.052445 · Cited by 39
Pulse based Variational Quantum Optimal Control for hybrid quantum computing
de Keijzer, R., Tse, O. T. C., & Kokkelmans, S. J. J. M. F. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-01-26-908 · Cited by 38
Quantum computing for fusion energy science applications
Joseph, I., Shi, Y. C., Porter, M. D., Castelli, A. R., Geyko, V., Graziani, F. R., Libby, S. B., & DuBois, J. L. (2023) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/5.0123765 · Cited by 42
Optimizing quantum circuits with Riemannian gradient flow
Wiersema, R., & Killoran, N. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062421 · Cited by 47
Quantum Simulation of Molecular Response Properties in the NISQ Era
Kumar, A., Asthana, A., Abraham, V., Crawford, T. D., Mayhall, N. J., Zhang, Y., Cincio, Ł., Tretiak, S., & Dub, P. A. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00731 · Cited by 35
Scalable quantum processor noise characterization
Hamilton, K. E., Kharazi, T., Morris, T., McCaskey, A., Bennink, R. S., & Pooser, R. C. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00060 · Cited by 36
Alam, M., Ash-Saki, A., & Ghosh, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.09631 · Cited by 33
Hybrid quantum neural network structures for image multi-classification
Shi, M., Situ, H., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad3e3d · Cited by 36
Kang, M., Nuomin, H., Chowdhury, S. N., Yuly, J. L., Sun, K., Whitlow, J., Valdiviezo, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, P., Beratan, D. N., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-024-00595-1 · Cited by 40
Krylov diagonalization of large many-body Hamiltonians on a quantum processor
Yoshioka, N., Amico, M., Kirby, W., Jurcevic, P., Dutt, A., Fuller, B., Garion, S., Haas, H., Hamamura, I., Ivrii, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59716-z · Cited by 64
Self-citationComparisons of Performance between Quantum and Classical Machine Learning
Havenstein, C., Thomas, D., & Chandrasekaran, S. (2018) · SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · Cited by 33
Preserving Symmetries for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers in the Presence of Noise
Barron, G. S., Gard, B., Altman, O. J., Mayhall, N. J., Barnes, E., & Economou, S. E. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.034003 · Cited by 38
Algorithmic Error Mitigation Scheme for Current Quantum Processors
Suchsland, P., Tacchino, F., Fischer, M. H., Neupert, T., Barkoutsos, P. K., & Tavernelli, I. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-01-492 · Cited by 36
Mitarai, K., Suzuki, Y., Mizukami, W., Nakagawa, Y. O., & Fujii, K. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033012 · Cited by 33
Aydeniz, K. Y., Gard, B., Jakowski, J., Majumder, S., Barron, G. S., Siopsis, G., Humble, T. S., & Pooser, R. C. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100012 · Cited by 40
Gauge-invariant quantum circuits for U (1) and Yang-Mills lattice gauge theories
Mazzola, G., Mathis, S. V., Mazzola, G., & Tavernelli, I. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043209 · Cited by 37
Quantum approximate optimization algorithm with adaptive bias fields
Yu, Y., Cao, C., Dewey, C., Wang, X., Shannon, N., & Joynt, R. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023249 · Cited by 41
Kottmann, K., Metz, F., Fraxanet, J., & Baldelli, N. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043184 · Cited by 37
Vacuum-gap transmon qubits realized using flip-chip technology
Li, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Li, Z., Wang, J., Su, T., Chen, M., Li, Y., Li, C.-Y., Mi, Z., et al. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0068255 · Cited by 35
SpinQ Gemini: a desktop quantum computing platform for education and research
Hou, S., Feng, G., Wu, Z., Zou, H., Shi, W., Zeng, J., Cao, C., Yü, S., Sheng, Z., Rao, X., et al. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00109-8 · Cited by 38
Bosse, J. L., & Montanaro, A. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.094409 · Cited by 33
End-To-End Quantum Machine Learning Implemented with Controlled Quantum Dynamics
Wu, R.-B., Cao, X., Xie, P., & Liu, Y.-X. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.064020 · Cited by 35
Efficient calculation of gradients in classical simulations of variational quantum algorithmsPreprint
Jones, T., & Gacon, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.02823 · Cited by 33
Quantum computed moments correction to variational estimates
Vallury, H. J., Jones, M. A., Hill, C. D., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-12-15-373 · Cited by 36
Mermin's inequalities of multiple qubits with orthogonal measurements on IBM Q 53‐qubit system
Huang, W., Chien, W., Cho, C., Huang, C., Huang, T., & Chang, C. (2020) · Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1002/que2.45 · Cited by 32
Simulating Noisy Variational Quantum Algorithms: A Polynomial Approach
Shao, Y., Wei, F., Cheng, S., & Liu, Z. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.120603 · Cited by 53
Quantum-Teleportation-Inspired Algorithm for Sampling Large Random Quantum Circuits
Chen, M.-C., Li, R., Gan, L., Zhu, X., Yang, G., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.080502 · Cited by 33
Mitarai, K., Yan, T., & Fujii, K. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.044087 · Cited by 32
Quantum computation of silicon electronic band structure
Cerasoli, F. T., Sherbert, K., Sławińska, J., & Nardelli, M. B. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp04008h · Cited by 38
Quantum approximate optimization for hard problems in linear algebra
Borle, A., Elfving, V. E., & Lomonaco, S. J. (2021) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.4.4.031 · Cited by 38
Quantum algorithm for alchemical optimization in material design
Barkoutsos, P. K., Gkritsis, F., Ollitrault, P. J., Sokolov, I. O., Woerner, S., & Tavernelli, I. (2021) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc05718e · Cited by 33
Maximal Entropy Approach for Quantum State Tomography
Gupta, R., Xia, R., Levine, R. D., & Kais, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010318 · Cited by 36
Designing a DDS-Based SoC for High-Fidelity Multi-Qubit Control
van Dijk, J. P. G., Patra, B., Pellerano, S., Edoardo Charbon, A., Sebastiano, F., & Babaie, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2020.3019413 · Cited by 32
Automated design of superconducting circuits and its application to 4-local couplers
Menke, T., Häse, F., Gustavsson, S., Kerman, A. J., Oliver, W. D., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00382-6 · Cited by 37
Variational quantum eigensolver techniques for simulating carbon monoxide oxidation
Sapova, M. D., & Fedorov, A. K. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00982-4 · Cited by 36
Nuclear two point correlation functions on a quantum computer
Baroni, A., Carlson, J., Gupta, R., Li, A. C. Y., Perdue, G., & Roggero, A. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.074503 · Cited by 32
Quantum simulation of chiral phase transitions
Czajka, A. M., Kang, Z.-B., Ma, H., & Zhao, F. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)209 · Cited by 42
Probing many-body localization by excited-state variational quantum eigensolver
Liu, S., Zhang, S., Hsieh, C., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.024204 · Cited by 35
Designing quantum annealing schedules using Bayesian optimization
Finžgar, J. R., Schuetz, M. J. A., Brubaker, J. K., Nishimori, H., & Katzgraber, H. G. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023063 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kandala, Abhinav
- Mezzacapo, Antonio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 549
- Issue
- 7671
- Pages
- 242-246
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2755255888
- Cited by
- 2,982
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 334 · 2025: 423 · 2024: 439 · 2023: 419 · 2022: 386 · 2021: 405 · 2020: 284 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 93.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- variational quantum eigensolver, quantum simulation, ground state energy, small molecules, lithium hydride, beryllium hydride, Heisenberg model, quantum magnetism, superconducting qubits, stochastic optimization, quantum chemistry, quantum error correction, noise modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
