Cited by 552Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity

Pellegrini, Adam F. A., Ahlström, Anders, Hobbie, Sarah E., Reich, Peter B., Nieradzik, Lars P., Staver, A. Carla, Scharenbroch, Bryant C., Jumpponen, Ari +3 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

Fire frequency is changing globally and is projected to affect the global carbon cycle and climate. However, uncertainty about how ecosystems respond to decadal changes in fire frequency makes it difficult to predict the effects of altered fire regimes on the carbon cycle; for instance, we do not fully understand the long-term effects of fire on soil carbon and nutrient storage, or whether fire-driven nutrient losses limit plant productivity. Here we analyse data from 48 sites in savanna grasslands, broadleaf forests and needleleaf forests spanning up to 65 years, during which time the frequency of fires was altered at each site. We find that frequently burned plots experienced a decline in surface soil carbon and nitrogen that was non-saturating through time, having 36 per cent (±13 per cent) less carbon and 38 per cent (±16 per cent) less nitrogen after 64 years than plots that were protected from fire. Fire-driven carbon and nitrogen losses were substantial in savanna grasslands and broadleaf forests, but not in temperate and boreal needleleaf forests. We also observe comparable soil carbon and nitrogen losses in an independent field dataset and in dynamic model simulations of global vegetation. The model study predicts that the long-term losses of soil nitrogen that result from more frequent burning may in turn decrease the carbon that is sequestered by net primary productivity by about 20 per cent of the total carbon that is emitted from burning biomass over the same period. Furthermore, we estimate that the effects of changes in fire frequency on ecosystem carbon storage may be 30 per cent too low if they do not include multidecadal changes in soil carbon, especially in drier savanna grasslands. Future changes in fire frequency may shift ecosystem carbon storage by changing soil carbon pools and nitrogen limitations on plant growth, altering the carbon sink capacity of frequently burning savanna grasslands and broadleaf forests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature24668

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intense or repeated fires can alter nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry when compared with unburned sites.

    “Because combustion results in losses of carbon and nitrogen, but not other elements such as phosphorus (Bodi et al., 2014;Butler, Elser, Lewis, Mackey, & Chen, 2018), intense or repeated fires can alter nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry when compared with unburned sites (Ludwig et al., 2018;Pellegrini et al., 2018).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Pellegrini et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellegrini, A. F. A., Ahlström, A., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., Nieradzik, L. P., Staver, A. C., Scharenbroch, B. C., Jumpponen, A., Anderegg, W. R. L., Randerson, J. T., & Jackson, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Pellegrini, Adam F. A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
553
Issue
7687
Pages
194-198
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2775664285
Cited by
552
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 24 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
fire frequency, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, net primary productivity, savanna grassland, broadleaf forest, needleleaf forests, carbon sequestration, nitrogen limitation, ecosystem carbon storage, climate change, land use change, carbon cycle, long-term fire effects, dynamic vegetation modelling, biomass burning emissions
MeSH terms
Wildfires, Calcium, Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, Soil, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Carbon Sequestration, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Geographic Mapping, Grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review