Predicting soil carbon loss with warming
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The large variability in the responses of SOC stocks to soil warming suggests a context-dependent response and a highly uncertain future for newly sequestered SOC, even when best management practices are maintained.
“The large variability in the responses of SOC stocks to soil warming (van Gestel et al., 2018) suggests a context- dependent response and a highly uncertain future for newly sequestered SOC, even when best management practices are maintained.”
From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as van Gestel et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 206
- Authors
- van Gestel, N., Shi, Z., van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W., Andresen, L. C., Dukes, J. S., Hovenden, M. J., Luo, Y., Michelsen, A., Pendall, E., Reich, P. B., Schuur, E. A. G., & Hungate, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 554
- Issue
- 7693
- Pages
- E4-E5
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2802184333
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Keywords
- soil carbon loss, global warming, soil carbon, soil carbon storage, soil microbial biomass carbon, soil stabilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
