Cited by 200Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityImmune Response and InflammationFungal and yeast genetics research

Recognition of DHN-melanin by a C-type lectin receptor is required for immunity to Aspergillus

Open access
Stappers, Mark H. T., Clark, Alexandra E., Aimanianda, Vishukumar, Bidula, Stefan, Reid, Delyth M., Asamaphan, Patawee, Hardison, Sarah E., Dambuza, Ivy M. +25 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

Resistance to infection is critically dependent on the ability of pattern recognition receptors to recognize microbial invasion and induce protective immune responses. One such family of receptors are the C-type lectins, which are central to antifungal immunity. These receptors activate key effector mechanisms upon recognition of conserved fungal cell-wall carbohydrates. However, several other immunologically active fungal ligands have been described; these include melanin, for which the mechanism of recognition is hitherto undefined. Here we identify a C-type lectin receptor, melanin-sensing C-type lectin receptor (MelLec), that has an essential role in antifungal immunity through recognition of the naphthalene-diol unit of 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN)-melanin. MelLec recognizes melanin in conidial spores of Aspergillus fumigatus as well as in other DHN-melanized fungi. MelLec is ubiquitously expressed by CD31+ endothelial cells in mice, and is also expressed by a sub-population of these cells that co-express epithelial cell adhesion molecule and are detected only in the lung and the liver. In mouse models, MelLec was required for protection against disseminated infection with A. fumigatus. In humans, MelLec is also expressed by myeloid cells, and we identified a single nucleotide polymorphism of this receptor that negatively affected myeloid inflammatory responses and significantly increased the susceptibility of stem-cell transplant recipients to disseminated Aspergillus infections. MelLec therefore recognizes an immunologically active component commonly found on fungi and has an essential role in protective antifungal immunity in both mice and humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature25974

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MelLec receptors expressed in endothelial and myeloid cells specifically recognize fungal melanin.

    “the recent study showing that MelLec receptors, expressed in endothelial and myeloid cells, specifically recognize fungal melanin [ 83 ]”

    From Melanin's Journey from Melanocytes to Keratinocytes: Uncovering the Molecular Mechanisms of Melanin Transfer and Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [83]

    The opening summary reports that MelLec recognizes DHN-melanin and is expressed by endothelial cells in mice and myeloid cells in humans. The recognition passage adds that MelLec did not detect melanin made through other pathways, including that of Cryptococcus neoformans. The claim is therefore too broad if “fungal melanin” means fungal melanin generally, and it omits the species distinction in cell expression. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A specific DHN-melanin C-type lectin receptor that triggers immune activation has been found on host immune cells.

    “A specific DHN-melanin C-type lectin receptor that triggers immune activation has been found on host immune cells (262), but its role during infection is not yet clear.”

    From Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 (2019) · cites this paper as [262]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 200

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Stoll MS Feizi T Proceeding of the Beilstein Symposium on Glyco-Bioinformatics 2009 123 140

Authors
Stappers, M. H. T., Clark, A. E., Aimanianda, V., Bidula, S., Reid, D. M., Asamaphan, P., Hardison, S. E., Dambuza, I. M., Valsecchi, I., Kerscher, B., Plato, A., Wallace, C. A., Yuecel, R., Hebecker, B., da Glória Teixeira Sousa, M., Cunha, C., Liu, Y., Feizi, T., Brakhage, A. A., Kwon-Chung, K. J., Gow, N. A. R., Zanda, M., Piras, M., Zanato, C., Jaeger, M., Netea, M. G., van de Veerdonk, F. L., Lacerda, J. F., Campos, A., Carvalho, A., Willment, J. A., Latgé, J.-P., & Brown, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • IPO Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Brown, Gordon D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
555
Issue
7696
Pages
382-386
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2789607808
Cited by
200
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (101873/A/13/Z, 097377/Z/11/Z, 097377, 099197, 101873, 108430, 102705, 093378, 102705/Z/13/Z)
  • University of Aberdeen (MR/N006364/1)
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-ISV3-0004)
  • Medical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology (MR/N006364/1)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N006364/1, MR/N006364, N006364/1)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (01-0145, NORTE-01–0145-FEDER-000013, IF/00735/2014, NORTE2020, NORTE-01-0145)
  • European Regional Development Fund (01-0145-FEDER-000013, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013, NORTE-2020)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
C-type lectin receptors, Aspergillus fumigatus, antifungal immunity, pattern recognition receptors, fungal melanin, endothelial cells, disseminated aspergillosis, single nucleotide polymorphisms, stem cell transplant recipients, myeloid cells, inflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cell Wall, Female, Humans, Macrophages, Melanins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Naphthols, Spores, Fungal, Substrate Specificity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Lectins, C-Type, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review