Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evolution of a transcriptional repression domain in an insect Hox protein

Galant, Ron, Carroll, Sean B.·2002·Nature

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature717

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302 (1992) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carroll, S. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature 376, 479–485 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gellon, G. & McGinnis, W. Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns. BioEssays 20, 116–125 (1998) · DOI
  4. Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K. & Weatherbee, S. D. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, 2001)
  5. McGinnis, N., Kuziora, M. A. & McGinnis, W. Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae. Cell 63, 969–976 (1990) · DOI
  6. Zhao, J. J., Lazzarini, R. A. & Pick, L. The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene. Genes Dev. 7, 343–354 (1993) · DOI
  7. Bachiller, D., Macias, A., Dubuoule, D. & Morata, G. Conservation of a functional hierarchy between mammalian and insect Hox/HOM genes. EMBO J. 13, 1930–1941 (1994) · DOI
  8. Zakany, J., Gerard, M., Favier, B., Potter, S. S. & Duboule, D. Functional equivalence and rescue among group 11 Hox gene products in vertebral patterning. Dev. Biol. 176, 325–328 (1996) · DOI
  9. Greer, J. M., Puetz, J., Thomas, K. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Maintenance of functional equivalence during paralogous Hox gene evolution. Nature 403, 661–665 (2000) · DOI
  10. Grenier, J. K. & Carroll, S. B. Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 704–709 (2000) · DOI
  11. Vachon, G. Homeotic genes of the Bithorax complex repress limb development in the abdomen of the Drosophila embryo through the target gene. Cell 71, 437–450 (1992) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ronshaugen, M., McGinnis, N. & McGinnis, W. Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature advance online publication, 6 February 2002 (DOI 10.1038/nature716). · DOI
  13. van Dijk, M. & Murre, C. extradenticle raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products. Cell 78, 617–624 (1994) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chang, C.-P., Shen, W.-F., Rozenfeld, S. & Lawrence, H. J. Pbx proteins display hexapeptide-dependent cooperative DNA binding with a subset of Hox proteins. Genes Dev. 9, 663–674 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Johnson, F. B., Parker, E. & Krasnow, M. A. Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 739–743 (1995) · DOI
  16. Manak, J. R., Mathies, L. D. & Scott, M. P. Regulation of a decapentaplegic midgut enhancer by homeotic proteins. Development 120, 3605–3619 (1994) · DOI
  17. Rauskolb, C. & Wieschaus, E. Coordinate regulation of downstream genes by extradenticle and the homeotic selector proteins. EMBO J. 13, 3561–3569 (1994) · DOI
  18. White, R. A. H., Aspland, S. E., Brookman, J. J., Clayton, L. & Sproat, G. The design and analysis of a homeotic response element. Mech. Dev. 91, 217–226 (2000) · DOI
  19. Hanna-Rose, W. & Hansen, U. Active repression mechanisms of eukaryotic transcription repressors. Trends Genet. 12, 229–234 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Yeung, K., Kim, S. & Reinberg, D. Functional dissection of a human Dr1–DRAP1 repressor complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 36–45 (1997) · DOI
  21. Janody, F., Sturny, R., Schaeffer, V., Azou, Y. & Dostatni, N. Two distinct domains of Bicoid mediate its transcriptional downregulation by the Torso pathway. Development 128, 2281–2290 (2001) · DOI
  22. Gibson, G. Evolution: Hox genes and the cellared wine principle. Curr. Biol. 10, 452–455 (2000) · DOI
  23. Alonso, C. R., Maxton-Kuechenmeister, J. & Akam, M. Evolution of Ftz protein function in insects. Curr. Biol. 11, 1473 (2001) · DOI
  24. Löhr, U., Miyuki, Y. & Pick, L. Drosophila fushi tarazu: a gene on the border of homeotic function. Curr. Biol. 11, 1403 (2001) · DOI
  25. Dearden, P. & Akam, M. Developmental evolution: Axial patterning in insects. Curr. Biol. 9, 591–594 (1999) · DOI
  26. Bennett, R. L., Brown, S. J. & Denell, R. E. Molecular and genetic analysis of the Tribolium Ultrabithorax ortholog, Ultrathorax. Dev. Genes Evol. 209, 608–619 (1999) · DOI
  27. Castelli-Gair, J., Greig, S., Micklem, G. & Akam, M. Dissecting the temporal requirements for homeotic gene function. Development 120, 1983–1985 (1994) · DOI
  28. Brand, A. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993) · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kelsh, R., Weinzierl, R., White, R. & Akam, M. Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: An antibody that detects conserved epitopes in Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A genes. Dev. Genet. 15, 19–31 (1994) · DOI
  30. Dalton, S. & Treisman, R. Characterization of SAP-1, a protein recruited by serum response factor to the C-fos serum response element. Cell 68, 597 (1992) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Galant, R., & Carroll, S. B.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-02
Volume
415
Issue
6874
Pages
910-913
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2095847047
Cited by
335
References
0
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.