The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Protein biomarker discovery produces lengthy lists of candidates that must subsequently be verified in blood or other accessible biofluids. Use of targeted mass spectrometry (MS) to verify disease- or therapy-related changes in protein levels requires the selection of peptides that are quantifiable surrogates for proteins of interest. Peptides that produce the highest ion-current response (high-responding peptides) are likely to provide the best detection sensitivity. Identification of the most effective signature peptides, particularly in the absence of experimental data, remains a major resource constraint in developing targeted MS–based assays. Here we describe a computational method that uses protein physicochemical properties to select high-responding peptides and demonstrate its utility in identifying signature peptides in plasma, a complex proteome with a wide range of protein concentrations. Our method, which employs a Random Forest classifier, facilitates the development of targeted MS–based assays for biomarker verification or any application where protein levels need to be measured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867
Self-citationAbsolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS
Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0832254100 · Cited by 1,733
Cited by
Naba, A., Clauser, K. R., Hoersch, S., Liu, H., Carr, S. A., & Hynes, R. O. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.014647 · Cited by 1,354
Self-citationSelected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions
Picotti, P., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2015 · Cited by 1,302
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments
Reiter, L., Rinner, O., Picotti, P., Hüttenhain, R., Beck, M., Brusniak, M.-Y., Hengartner, M. O., & Aebersold, R. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1584 · Cited by 532
Rauniyar, N. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms161226120 · Cited by 406
“Some of the common computational algorithms are PeptideSieve [30], enhanced signature peptide (ESP) predictor [42], consensus predictor for Q-peptide sequence (CONSeQuence) [43], and peptide response predictor (PREGO) [44].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fusaro, V. A., Mani, D. R., Mesirov, J. P., & Carr, S. A.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2009-01-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-198
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W1971042695
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt.1524
- The paper
- Fusaro, V. A., Mani, D. R., Mesirov, J. P., & Carr, S. A. (2009). Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.