Cited by 1,037Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma

Open access
Addona, Terri A, Abbatiello, Susan E, Schilling, Birgit, Skates, Steven J, Mani, D R, Bunk, David M, Spiegelman, Clifford H, Zimmerman, Lisa J +41 more·2009·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Verification of candidate biomarkers relies upon specific, quantitative assays optimized for selective detection of target proteins, and is increasingly viewed as a critical step in the discovery pipeline that bridges unbiased biomarker discovery to preclinical validation. Although individual laboratories have demonstrated that multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry can quantify candidate protein biomarkers in plasma, reproducibility and transferability of these assays between laboratories have not been demonstrated. We describe a multilaboratory study to assess reproducibility, recovery, linear dynamic range and limits of detection and quantification of multiplexed, MRM-based assays, conducted by NCI-CPTAC. Using common materials and standardized protocols, we demonstrate that these assays can be highly reproducible within and across laboratories and instrument platforms, and are sensitive to low mug/ml protein concentrations in unfractionated plasma. We provide data and benchmarks against which individual laboratories can compare their performance and evaluate new technologies for biomarker verification in plasma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1546

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPTAC and associated projects focused on targeted proteomics via SRM represent the most advanced work on robustness and transferability of quantitative proteomics methods to date.

    “Finally, a further comparison with CPTAC and associated projects focused on targeted proteomics via SRM is of interest as it represents the most advanced work on the robustness and transferability of quantitative proteomics methods to date24, 26, 27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 1,037

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Whiteaker JR Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer J. Proteome Res 2007 6 3962 3975 17711321

Authors
Addona, T. A., Abbatiello, S. E., Schilling, B., Skates, S. J., Mani, D. R., Bunk, D. M., Spiegelman, C. H., Zimmerman, L. J., Ham, A.-J. L., Keshishian, H., Hall, S. C., Allen, S., Blackman, R. K., Borchers, C. H., Buck, C., Cardasis, H. L., Cusack, M. P., Dodder, N. G., Gibson, B. W., Held, J. M., Hiltke, T., Jackson, A., Johansen, E. B., Kinsinger, C. R., Li, J., Mesri, M., Neubert, T. A., Niles, R. K., Pulsipher, T. C., Ransohoff, D., Rodriguez, H., Rudnick, P. A., Smith, D., Tabb, D. L., Tegeler, T. J., Variyath, A. M., Vega-Montoto, L. J., Wahlander, Å., Waldemarson, S., Wang, M., Whiteaker, J. R., Zhao, L., Anderson, N. L., Fisher, S. J., Liebler, D. C., Paulovich, A. G., Regnier, F. E., Tempst, P., & Carr, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Carr, Steven A
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2009-06-28
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
633-641
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2170791918
Cited by
1,037
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 130
FWCI
47.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2009-09-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Purdue University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Canary Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • University of Arizona
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • University of Victoria
  • Broad Institute
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging
  • York University
  • University of British Columbia
  • School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U24 126480, U24 126479, U24 126477)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA126480, U24CA126485, U24CA126476)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
multiple reaction monitoring, protein biomarkers, plasma proteomics, interlaboratory reproducibility, isotope dilution mass spectrometry, detection and quantification limits, linear dynamic range, biomarker verification
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Proteins, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Linear Models, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review