Cited by 348Pancreatic function and diabetesPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

Cell-surface markers for the isolation of pancreatic cell types derived from human embryonic stem cells

Kelly, Olivia G, Chan, Man Yin, Martinson, Laura A, Kadoya, Kuniko, Ostertag, Traci M, Ross, Kelly G, Richardson, Mike, Carpenter, Melissa K +5 more·2011·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Using a flow cytometry-based screen of commercial antibodies, we have identified cell-surface markers for the separation of pancreatic cell types derived from human embryonic stem (hES) cells. We show enrichment of pancreatic endoderm cells using CD142 and of endocrine cells using CD200 and CD318. After transplantation into mice, enriched pancreatic endoderm cells give rise to all the pancreatic lineages, including functional insulin-producing cells, demonstrating that they are pancreatic progenitors. In contrast, implanted, enriched polyhormonal endocrine cells principally give rise to glucagon cells. These antibodies will aid investigations that use pancreatic cells generated from pluripotent stem cells to study diabetes and pancreas biology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1931

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ViaCyte developed a stem cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cell population known as PEC-01, which they demonstrated to mature over several months in vivo into insulin-producing endocrine cells in rodent models.

    “In particular, ViaCyte developed a stem cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cell population known as PEC-01, which they demonstrated to mature over several months in vivo into insulin-producing endocrine cells in rodent models.29–31”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 348

Authors
Kelly, O. G., Chan, M. Y., Martinson, L. A., Kadoya, K., Ostertag, T. M., Ross, K. G., Richardson, M., Carpenter, M. K., D'Amour, K. A., Kroon, E., Moorman, M., Baetge, E. E., & Bang, A. G.
Affiliations
ViaCyte (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Olivia G
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2011-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
750-756
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W1993222615
Cited by
348
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 28
FWCI
33.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
cell surface markers, human embryonic stem cells, pancreatic progenitors, tissue factor, CD200, insulin-producing cells, glucagon cells, pancreatic differentiation, transplantation, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Cell Separation, Cells, Cultured, Endoderm, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Pancreas, Transplantation, Heterologous, Biomarkers, Antigens, CD, Mice, SCID, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review