RIKEN suspends first clinical trial involving induced pluripotent stem cells
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A clinical trial in Japan for macular degeneration was paused due to genetic variation.
“For example, a clinical trial in Japan for macular degeneration was paused due to genetic variation.162”
From Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes (2023) · cites this paper as [162]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- Garber, K.
- Corresponding author
- Garber, Ken
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 890-891
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W1436283894
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Keywords
- induced pluripotent stem cells, clinical trial suspension, RIKEN, stem cell therapy regulation
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Japan, Macular Degeneration, Drug Approval, Stem Cell Transplantation, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Early Termination of Clinical Trials, Stem Cell Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
