Cited by 287Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1–AMPK signalling

Open access
Lin, Ruiting, Elf, Shannon, Shan, Changliang, Kang, Hee-Bum, Ji, Quanjiang, Zhou, Lu, Hitosugi, Taro, Zhang, Liang +29 more·2015·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) contributes to tumour growth, but the precise contribution of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), the third enzyme in this pathway, to tumorigenesis remains unclear. We found that suppression of 6PGD decreased lipogenesis and RNA biosynthesis and elevated ROS levels in cancer cells, attenuating cell proliferation and tumour growth. 6PGD-mediated production of ribulose-5-phosphate (Ru-5-P) inhibits AMPK activation by disrupting the active LKB1 complex, thereby activating acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 and lipogenesis. Ru-5-P and NADPH are thought to be precursors in RNA biosynthesis and lipogenesis, respectively; thus, our findings provide an additional link between the oxidative PPP and lipogenesis through Ru-5-P-dependent inhibition of LKB1-AMPK signalling. Moreover, we identified and developed 6PGD inhibitors, physcion and its derivative S3, that effectively inhibited 6PGD, cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth in nude mice xenografts without obvious toxicity, suggesting that 6PGD could be an anticancer target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncb3255

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies regard PGD as an anti-cancer target because PGD downregulation selectively inhibits the growth of various cancer cells through the AMPK pathway.

    “Multiple studies regard PGD as an anti-cancer target as PGD downregulation selectively inhibits the growth of various cancer cells through AMPK pathway,130,131,132”

    From Single-cell senescence identification reveals senescence heterogeneity, trajectory, and modulators (2024) · cites this paper as [131]

    The Results report that 6PGD knockdown reduced proliferation in several cancer cell lines but not control HaCaT cells, and that AMPK inhibition partly rescued reduced proliferation in H1299 cells. However, the Results also show that proliferation fell in LKB1-deficient A549 cells without a change in AMPK phosphorylation; antioxidant treatment rescued that effect. The AMPK mechanism therefore does not account for the growth inhibition in every cancer cell type studied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 287

Authors
Lin, R., Elf, S., Shan, C., Kang, H.-B., Ji, Q., Zhou, L., Hitosugi, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Seo, J. H., Xie, J., Tucker, M., Gu, T.-L., Sudderth, J., Jiang, L., Mitsche, M., DeBerardinis, R. J., Wu, S., Li, Y., Mao, H., Chen, P. R., Wang, D., Chen, G. Z., Hurwitz, S. J., Lonial, S., Arellano, M. L., Khoury, H. J., Khuri, F. R., Lee, B. H., Lei, Q., Brat, D. J., Ye, K., Boggon, T. J., He, C., Kang, S., Fan, J., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Cell Signaling Technology (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kang, Sumin
  • Fan, Jun
  • Chen, Jing
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2015-10-19
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1484-1496
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2112912738
Cited by
287
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA174786, R01CA174786, CA183594, R01CA175316, CA175316, R01CA183594, CA140515, R01CA140515, P30CA138292)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM071440, R01GM071440, T32GM008602)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, ribulose 5-phosphate, lipogenesis, acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1, tumor growth, reactive oxygen species, RNA synthesis, NADPH, physcion, cancer therapy targets, tumor cell proliferation
MeSH terms
AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Humans, Neoplasms, Pentose Phosphate Pathway, Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase, Ribulosephosphates, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Oxidative Stress, Lipogenesis, AMP-Activated Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review