Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 540

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding and controlling the substrate effect on graphene electron-transfer chemistry via reactivity imprint lithography

Open access
Wang, Qing Hua, Jin, Zhong, Kim, Ki Kang, Hilmer, Andrew J., Paulus, Geraldine L. C., Shih, Chih-Jen, Ham, Moon-Ho, Sanchez-Yamagishi, Javier D., Watanabe, Kenji, Taniguchi, Takashi, Kong, Jing, Jarillo-Herrero, Pablo, Strano, Michael S.·2012·Nature Chemistry

Abstract

The chemical functionalization of graphene enables control over electronic properties and sensor recognition sites. However, its study is confounded by an unusually strong influence of the underlying substrate. In this paper, we show a stark difference in the rate of electron transfer chemistry with aryl diazonium salts on monolayer graphene supported on a broad range of substrates. Reactions proceed rapidly when graphene is on SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 (sapphire), but negligibly on alkyl-terminated and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) surfaces. The effect is contrary to expectations based on doping levels and can instead be described using a reactivity model accounting for substrate-induced electron-hole puddles in graphene. Raman spectroscopic mapping is used to characterize the effect of the substrates on graphene. Reactivity imprint lithography (RIL) is demonstrated as a technique for spatially patterning chemical groups on graphene by patterning the underlying substrate, and is applied to the covalent tethering of proteins on graphene. of graphene chemical reactivity. This method allows chemical reactions on graphene to be spatially patterned over large areas without the use of disruptive resist materials or etchants. We use RIL to spatially control the conjugation of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) on graphene directly from solution,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchem.1421

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 540

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Q. H., Jin, Z., Kim, K. K., Hilmer, A. J., Paulus, G. L. C., Shih, C.-J., Ham, M.-H., Sanchez-Yamagishi, J. D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Kong, J., Jarillo-Herrero, P., & Strano, M. S.
Venue
Nature Chemistry
Published
2012-08-12
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
724-732
ISSN
  • 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4349
OpenAlex
W2152082800
Cited by
540
References
1
FWCI
18.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and controlling the substrate effect on graphene electron-transfer chemistry via reactivity imprint lithography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nchem.1421
The paper
Wang, Q. H., Jin, Z., Kim, K. K., Hilmer, A. J., Paulus, G. L. C., Shih, C.-J., Ham, M.-H., Sanchez-Yamagishi, J. D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Kong, J., Jarillo-Herrero, P., & Strano, M. S. (2012). Understanding and controlling the substrate effect on graphene electron-transfer chemistry via reactivity imprint lithography. Nature Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1421

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.