Functional end groups for polymers prepared using ring-opening metathesis polymerization
Abstract
The precise placement of functional groups on the chain-ends of macromolecules is a major focus of polymer research. Most common living polymerization techniques offer specific methods of end-functionalization governed by the active propagating species and the kinetics of the polymerization reaction. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization has established itself as one of the most functional-group-tolerant living polymerization techniques known, but this tolerance has limited the number of available functionalization reactions. Metathesis chemists have therefore been required to develop a variety of end-functionalizations, adapting each of them to the reactivity scheme of the particular catalysts used and the complexity of the group to be attached. This review presents an overview of the methods developed for different types and generations of metathesis catalysts that are typically used in such polymerizations. We also present a 'field guide' of functionalization methods highlighting the factors to be considered when choosing the most appropriate approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The good control of polymer structures possible via ROMP has led to many studies concerning the synthesis of polymers with well-defined end groups.
“The good control of polymer structures possible via ROMP has led to many studies concerning the synthesis of polymers with well-defined end groups which have been reviewed in detail recently [146].”
From Ring-Opening Polymerization—An Introductory Review (2013) · cites this paper as [146]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Hilf, S., & Kilbinger, A. F. M.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kilbinger, Andreas F. M.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2009-09-23
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 537-546
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W2037797074
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Keywords
- ring-opening metathesis polymerization, functional end groups, end-functionalization, living polymerization, metathesis catalysts, functional group tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Molybdenum, Organometallic Compounds, Polymers, Ruthenium, Molecular Structure, Macromolecular Substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review