Cited by 82RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and disease

Dynamic refolding of IFN-γ mRNA enables it to function as PKR activator and translation template

Cohen-Chalamish, Smadar, Hasson, Anat, Weinberg, Dahlia, Namer, Lise Sarah, Banai, Yona, Osman, Farhat, Kaempfer, Raymond·2009·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

Interferon-gamma mRNA activates the RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR, which in turn strongly attenuates translation of interferon-gamma mRNA. Unlike riboswitches restricted to noncoding regions, the interferon-gamma RNA domain that activates PKR comprises the 5' UTR and 26 translated codons. Extensive interferon-gamma coding sequence is thus dedicated to activating PKR and blocking interferon-gamma synthesis. This implies that the PKR activator is disrupted by ribosomes during translation initiation and must refold promptly to restore PKR activation. The activator structure harbors an essential kink-turn, probably to allow formation of a pseudoknot that is critical for PKR activation. Three indispensable short helices, bordered by orientation-sensitive base pairs, align with the pseudoknot stem, generating RNA helix of sufficient length to activate PKR. Through gain-of-function mutations, we show that the RNA activator can adopt alternative conformations that activate PKR. This flexibility promotes efficient refolding of interferon-gamma mRNA, which is necessary for its dual function as translation template and activator of PKR, and which thus prevents overexpression of this inflammatory cytokine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association of IRE with IRP prevents the 43S complex from assembling on the 5′UTR of mRNA, thereby suppressing translation.

    “This event prevents the 43S complex from assembling on the 5′UTR of mRNA, thereby suppressing translation [11].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen-Chalamish, S., Hasson, A., Weinberg, D., Namer, L. S., Banai, Y., Osman, F., & Kaempfer, R.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Kaempfer, Raymond
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2009-10-04
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
896-903
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2080331286
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
PKR activation, RNA-dependent protein kinase, pseudoknot, kink-turn, 5' untranslated region, translation initiation, RNA structure, cytokine regulation, RNA helix
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Messenger, Templates, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, eIF-2 Kinase, 5' Untranslated Regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review