The current status of climate change research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This exponential growth in peer-reviewed scientific publications on climate change is already pushing manual expert assessments to their limits.
“This exponential growth in peer-reviewed scientific publications on climate change 4,5 is already pushing manual expert assessments to their limits.”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
The wider climate literature is growing exponentially.
“and the wider climate literature is growing exponentially 4,5 .”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Minghua
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 72-73
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2072623762
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Keywords
- climate change research, climate change mitigation scenarios, carbon dioxide removal, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
