Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 797

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global trends in tropical cyclone risk

Open access
Peduzzi, P., Chatenoux, B., Dao, H., De Bono, A., Herold, C., Kossin, J., Mouton, F., Nordbeck, O.·2012·Nature Climate Change
DOI 10.1038/nclimate1410
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Assessments of tropical cyclone risk trends are typically based on reported losses, which are biased by improvements in information access. Now research based on thousands of physically observed events and contextual factors shows that, despite projected reductions in tropical cyclone frequency, projected increases in demographic pressure and tropical cyclone intensity can be expected to exacerbate disaster risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate1410

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Tobin, G. A. & Montz, B. E. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration (Guilford Press, 1997).
  2. Coburn, A. W., Spence, R. J. S. & Pomonis, A. Vulnerability and risk assessment. UNDP Disaster Management Training Program Vol. 57 (1997).
  3. Elsner, J. B., Kossin, J. P. & Jagger, T. H. The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455, 92–95 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bender, M. A. et al. Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes. Science 327, 454–458 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C. & Mouton, F. Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: The Disaster Risk Index. Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 9, 1149–1159 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J. & Neumann, C. J. The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying tropical cyclone best track data. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 363–376 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Paul, B. K. Why relatively fewer people died? The case of Bangladesh’s Cyclone Sidr. Nat. Hazard. 50, 289–304 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Webster, P. J. Myanmar’s deadly daffodil. Nature Geosci. 1, 488–490 (2008). · doi:10.1038/ngeo257
  9. Landsea, C. W., Harper, B. A., Hoarau, K. & Kaff, J. Can we detect trends in extreme tropical cyclones? Science 313, 452–454 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Holland, G. J. An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Mon. Weath. Rev. 108, 1212–1218 (1980). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Willoughby, H. E. & Rahn, M. E. Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part I: Observations and evaluation of the Holland (1980) model. Mon. Weath. Rev. 132, 3033–3048 (2004). · doi:10.1175/mwr2831.1
  12. Willoughby, H. E., Rahn, M. E. & Darling, R. W. R. Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part II: A new family of sectionally continuous profiles. Mon. Weath. Rev. 134, 1102–1120 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Holland, G. A revised hurricane pressure–wind model. Mon. Weath. Rev. 136, 3432–3445 (2008). · doi:10.1175/2008mwr2395.1
  14. Davidson, R., Zhao, H. & Kumar, V. Quantitative model to forecast changes in hurricane vulnerability of regional building inventory. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9, 55–64 (2003). · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2003)9:2(55
  15. Vickery, P. J., Skerlj, P. F., Steckley, A. C. & Twisdale, L. A. Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations. J. Struct. Eng. 126, 1203–1221 (2000). · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1203 · Paper page
  16. Jain, V. K., Davidson, R. & Rosowsky, D. Modelling changes in hurricane risk over time. Nat. Hazard. Rev. 6, 88–96 (2005). · doi:10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2005)6:2(88
  17. Apivatanagul, P., Davidson, R., Blanton, B. & Nozick, L. Long-term regional hurricane hazard analysis for wind and storm surge. Coast. Eng. 58, 499–509 (2011). · doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.01.015
  18. Poulos, H. M. Spatially explicit mapping of hurricane risk in New England, USA using ArcGIS. Nat. Hazard. 54, 1015–1023 (2010). · doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9502-0
  19. Rumpf, J., Weindl, H., Höppe, P., Rauch, E. & Schmidt, V. Tropical cyclone hazard assessment using model-based track simulation. Nat. Hazard. 48, 383–398 (2008). · doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9268-9
  20. Legg, M. R., Nozick, L. K. & Davidson, R. A. Optimizing the selection of hazard-consistent probabilistic scenarios for long-term regional hurricane loss estimation. Struct. Safety 32, 90–100 (2010). · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.002
  21. Esteban, M. & Longarte-Galnares, G. Evaluation of the productivity decrease risk due to a future increase in tropical cyclone intensity in Japan. Risk Anal. 30, 1789–1802 (2010). · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01483.x
  22. Vickery, P. J., Masters, F. J., Powell, M. D. & Wadhera, D. Hurricane hazard modelling: The past, present, and future. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97, 392–405 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Peduzzi, P., Dao, H. & Herold, C. Mapping disastrous natural hazards using global datasets. Nat. Hazard. 35, 265–289 (2005). · DOI

Cited by

See all 797

Metadata

Authors
Peduzzi, P., Chatenoux, B., Dao, H., De Bono, A., Herold, C., Kossin, J., Mouton, F., & Nordbeck, O.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-02-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
289-294
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
DOI
10.1038/nclimate1410
OpenAlex
W2107718915
Cited by
797
References
1
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nclimate1410
The paper
Peduzzi, P., Chatenoux, B., Dao, H., De Bono, A., Herold, C., Kossin, J., Mouton, F., & Nordbeck, O. (2012). Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.