Mixed responses of tropical Pacific fisheries and aquaculture to climate change
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our habitat predictions showed a slightly higher latitudinal range compared to those predicted by coupled biophysical models for skipjack in the Pacific, Indian, and worldwide, and for Pacific bigeye tuna.
“However, our habitat predictions showed a slightly higher latitudinal range compared to those predicted by coupled biophysical models in the case of skipjack in the Pacific Ocean (Bell et al., 2013;Lehodey et al., 2013), Indian Ocean (Dueri, 2012), and worldwide (Dueri, 2014), as well as in the case of Pacific bigeye tuna (Lehodey et al., 2010).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Bell et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 321
- Authors
- Bell, J. D., Ganachaud, A., Gehrke, P. C., Griffiths, S. P., Hobday, A. J., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Johnson, J. E., Le Borgne, R., Lehodey, P., Lough, J. M., Matear, R. J., Pickering, T. D., Pratchett, M. S., Gupta, A. S., Senina, I., & Waycott, M.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Community (NC)
- Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
- SMEC (Australia) (AU)
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
- Southern Cross University (AU)
- Collecte Localisation Satellites (France) (FR)
- Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU)
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- State Herbarium of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bell, Johann D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2013-03-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 591-599
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W1977482599
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Keywords
- climate change impacts, aquaculture, tuna, coral reef fisheries, coastal aquaculture, mariculture, freshwater aquaculture, food security, Pacific Island countries, marine habitats, food webs, fisheries economics, population growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
