The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Public perception and understanding of climate change has remained polarized.
“Public perception about the reality of climate change has remained polarized”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as McCright et al., 2014
Cites
Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1295 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Unstable climates: Exploring the statistical and social constructions of ‘normal’ climate
Hulme, M., Dessai, S., Lorenzoni, I., & Nelson, D. R. (2009) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.010 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.353 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Credibility of climate change denial in social media
Samantray, A., & Pin, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0344-4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCright, Aaron M.
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2014-11-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1077-1081
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2005906361
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 31.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- temperature anomalies, winter temperature, climate change attribution, political orientation, climate change beliefs, climate change adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
