Cited by 281Plant responses to elevated CO2Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Elevated CO2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil

Ellsworth, David S., Anderson, Ian C., Crous, Kristine Y., Cooke, Julia, Drake, John E., Gherlenda, Andrew N., Gimeno, Teresa E., Macdonald, Catriona A. +4 more·2017·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate3235

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental evidence suggests that CO2 fertilization also depends on soil nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus.

    “Experimental evidence suggests that CO2 fertilization also depends on soil nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus57,58.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. Ellsworth, D.S. et al. Aboveground net primary productivity and photosynthesis for EucFACE from 2013 to 2015. Research Data Australia, http://doi.org/10.4225/35/57ec5d4a2b78e (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellsworth, D. S., Anderson, I. C., Crous, K. Y., Cooke, J., Drake, J. E., Gherlenda, A. N., Gimeno, T. E., Macdonald, C. A., Medlyn, B. E., Powell, J. R., Tjoelker, M. G., & Reich, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Interaction Sol Plante Atmosphère (FR)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Ellsworth, David S.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
279-282
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2592577517
Cited by
281
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 6
FWCI
25.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
elevated CO2, eucalypt forest, phosphorus limitation, low phosphorus soils, tree growth, aboveground productivity, leaf photosynthesis, phosphorus fertilization, evergreen broad-leaved forest, tropical forests, carbon sink, nitrogen limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review