The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations affect alternative splicing by promoting alternative branchpoint usage
Open accessAbstract
Hotspot mutations in the spliceosome gene SF3B1 are reported in ∼20% of uveal melanomas. SF3B1 is involved in 3′-splice site (3′ss) recognition during RNA splicing; however, the molecular mechanisms of its mutation have remained unclear. Here we show, using RNA-Seq analyses of uveal melanoma, that the SF3B1 R625/K666 mutation results in deregulated splicing at a subset of junctions, mostly by the use of alternative 3′ss. Modelling the differential junctions in SF3B1 WT and SF3B1 R625/K666 cell lines demonstrates that the deregulated splice pattern strictly depends on SF3B1 status and on the 3’ss-sequence context. SF3B1 WT knockdown or overexpression do not reproduce the SF3B1 R625/K666 splice pattern, qualifying SF3B1 R625/K666 as change-of-function mutants. Mutagenesis of predicted branchpoints reveals that the SF3B1 R625/K666 -promoted splice pattern is a direct result of alternative branchpoint usage. Altogether, this study provides a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying splicing alterations induced by mutant SF3B1 in cancer, and reveals a role for alternative branchpoints in disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia
Yoshida, K., Sanada, M., Shiraishi, Y., Nowak, D., Nagata, Y., Yamamoto, R., Sato, Y., Sato-Otsubo, A., Kon, A., Nagasaki, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10496 · Cited by 2,029
Cited by
U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro
Oh, J.-M., Venters, C. C., Di, C., Pinto, A. M., Wan, L., Younis, I., Cai, Z., Arai, C., So, B. R., Duan, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · Cited by 7,157
Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy
Xie, N., Shen, G., Gao, W., Huang, Z., Huang, C., & Fu, L. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x · Cited by 1,020
RNA splicing dysregulation and the hallmarks of cancer
Bradley, R. K., & Anczuków, O. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00541-7 · Cited by 579
Therapeutic targeting of splicing in cancer
Lee, S. C.-W., & Abdel-Wahab, O. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4165 · Cited by 561
Urbanski, L. M., Leclair, N., & Anczuków, O. (2018) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.1476 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Alsafadi, S., Houy, A., Battistella, A., Popova, T., Wassef, M., Henry, E., Tirode, F., Constantinou, A., Piperno-Neumann, S., Roman-Roman, S., Dutertre, M., & Stern, M.-H.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2016-02-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10615-10615
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2413340136
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations affect alternative splicing by promoting alternative branchpoint usage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms10615
- The paper
- Alsafadi, S., Houy, A., Battistella, A., Popova, T., Wassef, M., Henry, E., Tirode, F., Constantinou, A., Piperno-Neumann, S., Roman-Roman, S., Dutertre, M., & Stern, M.-H. (2016). Cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations affect alternative splicing by promoting alternative branchpoint usage. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.