Cited by 63Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Accelerated oral nanomedicine discovery from miniaturized screening to clinical production exemplified by paediatric HIV nanotherapies

Open access
Giardiello, Marco, Liptrott, Neill J., McDonald, Tom O., Moss, Darren, Siccardi, Marco, Martin, Phil, Smith, Darren, Gurjar, Rohan +2 more·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Considerable scope exists to vary the physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles, with subsequent impact on biological interactions; however, no accelerated process to access large nanoparticle material space is currently available, hampering the development of new nanomedicines. In particular, no clinically available nanotherapies exist for HIV populations and conventional paediatric HIV medicines are poorly available; one current paediatric formulation utilizes high ethanol concentrations to solubilize lopinavir, a poorly soluble antiretroviral. Here we apply accelerated nanomedicine discovery to generate a potential aqueous paediatric HIV nanotherapy, with clinical translation and regulatory approval for human evaluation. Our rapid small-scale screening approach yields large libraries of solid drug nanoparticles (160 individual components) targeting oral dose. Screening uses 1 mg of drug compound per library member and iterative pharmacological and chemical evaluation establishes potential candidates for progression through to clinical manufacture. The wide applicability of our strategy has implications for multiple therapy development programmes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms13184

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, the optimized nanoparticle formulation was bioequivalent to lopinavir dissolved in alcohol and propylene glycol.

    “In rats, the optimized nanoparticle formulation was bioequivalent to lopinavir dissolved in alcohol and propylene glycol 99 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [99]

  • Oral antiretroviral nanoparticles have been developed for paediatric use, produced by a novel emulsion template freeze-drying approach, and loaded with lopinavir and efavirenz.

    “Oral antiretroviral nanoparticles have been developed for paediatric use with the intent to replace tablets (which are difficult to swallow) and alcohol-containing solutions (which contain harmful excipients). These nanoparticles are produced by a novel emulsion template freeze-drying approach and have been loaded with lopinavir and efavirenz 99 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [99]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McDonald T. O.. in Global Approaches to Health and Safety Issues (ed. Dolez, P. I.) (Elsevier, 2015).
  2. World Health Organisation. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. ISBN 978 92 4 150956 5 (2015). 26598776

Authors
Giardiello, M., Liptrott, N. J., McDonald, T. O., Moss, D., Siccardi, M., Martin, P., Smith, D., Gurjar, R., Rannard, S. P., & Owen, A.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Rannard, Steve P.
  • Owen, Andrew
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-10-21
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
13184-13184
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2539238579
Cited by
63
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K002201/1, EP/G066272/1, EP/I038721/1, EP/L02635X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
oral nanomedicine, pediatric HIV, lopinavir, clinical translation, regulatory approval
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Cell Membrane Permeability, Child, Humans, Male, HIV Infections, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Caco-2 Cells, Anti-HIV Agents, Ritonavir, Nanomedicine, Rats, Nanoparticles, Small Molecule Libraries, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Translational Research, Biomedical, Lopinavir

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review