Cancer-cell intrinsic gene expression signatures overcome intratumoural heterogeneity bias in colorectal cancer patient classification
Open accessAbstract
Stromal-derived intratumoural heterogeneity (ITH) has been shown to undermine molecular stratification of patients into appropriate prognostic/predictive subgroups. Here, using several clinically relevant colorectal cancer (CRC) gene expression signatures, we assessed the susceptibility of these signatures to the confounding effects of ITH using gene expression microarray data obtained from multiple tumour regions of a cohort of 24 patients, including central tumour, the tumour invasive front and lymph node metastasis. Sample clustering alongside correlative assessment revealed variation in the ability of each signature to cluster samples according to patient-of-origin rather than region-of-origin within the multi-region dataset. Signatures focused on cancer-cell intrinsic gene expression were found to produce more clinically useful, patient-centred classifiers, as exemplified by the CRC intrinsic signature (CRIS), which robustly clustered samples by patient-of-origin rather than region-of-origin. These findings highlight the potential of cancer-cell intrinsic signatures to reliably stratify CRC patients by minimising the confounding effects of stromal-derived ITH.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CMS4 subtype is enriched at the invasive margin as compared with the tumor core.
“multisampling analyses have revealed an enrichment in the CMS4 subtype at the invasive margin as compared with the tumor core (11).”
From Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
The CMS4 tumor state arises from the progression of a less aggressive state, rather than originating from a distinct carcinogenesis pathway, perhaps with the exception of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer.
“Altogether, several works based on paired tumor regions (11, 19, 30) support the notion that the CMS4 tumor state arises from the progression of a less aggressive state, rather than originating from a distinct carcinogenesis pathway, perhaps with the exception of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer (25).”
From Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Dunne, P. D., Alderdice, M., O'Reilly, P. G., Roddy, A. C., McCorry, A. M. B., Richman, S., Maughan, T., McDade, S. S., Johnston, P. G., Longley, D. B., Kay, E., McArt, D. G., & Lawler, M.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- St James's University Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Dunne, Philip D.
- Lawler, Mark
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15657-15657
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5460026
- OpenAlex
- W2618505595
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (24387, 12148)
- Public Health Agency (SPI/3315/06, STL/5175/15)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17117, MR/M016587/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer, intratumoral heterogeneity, patient classification, lymph node metastasis
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Neoplasm Metastasis, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review