The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene
Open accessAbstract
Graphene is emerging as a viable alternative to conventional optoelectronic, plasmonic and nanophotonic materials. The interaction of light with charge carriers creates an out-of-equilibrium distribution, which relaxes on an ultrafast timescale to a hot Fermi-Dirac distribution, that subsequently cools emitting phonons. Although the slower relaxation mechanisms have been extensively investigated, the initial stages still pose a challenge. Experimentally, they defy the resolution of most pump-probe setups, due to the extremely fast sub-100 fs carrier dynamics. Theoretically, massless Dirac fermions represent a novel many-body problem, fundamentally different from Schrödinger fermions. Here we combine pump-probe spectroscopy with a microscopic theory to investigate electron–electron interactions during the early stages of relaxation. We identify the mechanisms controlling the ultrafast dynamics, in particular the role of collinear scattering. This gives rise to Auger processes, including charge multiplication, which is key in photovoltage generation and photodetectors. Investigation of the initial stages of the interaction of light with carriers in graphene is challenging. Here the authors probe the process with ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy and microscopic theory, and observe the role of collinear scattering, which gives rise to Auger processes, including carrier multiplication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Critical Transport in Clean Graphene
Fritz, L., Schmalian, J., Müller, M., & Sachdev, S. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.085416 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems
Koppens, F. H. L., Mueller, T., Avouris, P., Ferrari, A. C., Vitiello, M. S., & Polini, M. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.215 · Cited by 3,828
Self-citationGraphene Plasmonics: Challenges and Opportunities
García de Abajo, F. J. (2014) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/ph400147y · Cited by 1,254
Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature
Liu, C.-H., Chang, Y.-C., Norris, T. B., & Zhong, Z. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.31 · Cited by 1,207
Graphene-based integrated photonics for next-generation datacom and telecom
Romagnoli, M., Sorianello, V., Midrio, M., Koppens, F. H. L., Huyghebaert, C., Neumaier, D., Galli, P., Templ, W., D’Errico, A., & Ferrari, A. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0040-9 · Cited by 409
Self-citationHydrodynamics of electrons in graphene
Lucas, A., & Fong, K. C. (2018) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aaa274 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Brida, D., Tomadin, A., Manzoni, C., Kim, Y. J., Lombardo, A., Milana, S., Nair, R. R., Novoselov, K. S., Ferrari, A. C., Cerullo, G., & Polini, M.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-06-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1987-1987
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171017401
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.