The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube–copper composite
Open accessAbstract
Increased portability, versatility and ubiquity of electronics devices are a result of their progressive miniaturization, requiring current flow through narrow channels. Present-day devices operate close to the maximum current-carrying-capacity (that is, ampacity) of conductors (such as copper and gold), leading to decreased lifetime and performance, creating demand for new conductors with higher ampacity. Ampacity represents the maximum current-carrying capacity of the object that depends both on the structure and material. Here we report a carbon nanotube–copper composite exhibiting similar conductivity (2.3–4.7 × 105 S cm−1) as copper (5.8 × 105 S cm−1), but with a 100-times higher ampacity (6 × 108 A cm−2). Vacuum experiments demonstrate that carbon nanotubes suppress the primary failure pathways in copper as observed by the increased copper diffusion activation energy (∼2.0 eV) in carbon nanotube–copper composite, explaining its higher ampacity. This is the only material with both high conductivity and high ampacity, making it uniquely suited for applications in microscale electronics and inverters. High electrical conductivity and ampacity are usually mutually exclusive properties. Here, in a carbon nanotube–copper composite, Subramaniam et al. achieve a similar conductivity to copper, but with a hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
High-field electrical transport in single-wall carbon nanotubes
Yao, Z., Kane, C. L., & Dekker, C. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2941 · Cited by 1,501
Cited by
Electric Drive Technology Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities for Future Electric Vehicles
Husain, I., Ozpineci, B., Islam, M. S., Gurpinar, E., Su, G.-J., Yu, W., Chowdhury, S., Xue, L., Rahman, D., & Sahu, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3046112 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Subramaniam, C., Yamada, T., Kobashi, K., Sekiguchi, A., Futaba, D. N., Yumura, M., & Hata, K.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-07-23
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2202-2202
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055512203
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube–copper composite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms3202
- The paper
- Subramaniam, C., Yamada, T., Kobashi, K., Sekiguchi, A., Futaba, D. N., Yumura, M., & Hata, K. (2013). One hundred fold increase in current carrying capacity in a carbon nanotube–copper composite. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.