The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confinement of pyridinium hemicyanine dye within an anionic metal-organic framework for two-photon-pumped lasing
Open accessAbstract
Two-photon-pumped dye lasers are very important because of their applications in wavelength up-conversion, optical data storage, biological imaging and photodynamic therapy. Such lasers are very difficult to realize in the solid state because of the aggregation-caused quenching. Here we demonstrate a new two-photon-pumped micro-laser by encapsulating the cationic pyridinium hemicyanine dye into an anionic metal-organic framework (MOF). The resultant MOF⊃dye composite exhibits significant two-photon fluorescence because of the large absorption cross-section and the encapsulation-enhanced luminescent efficiency of the dye. Furthermore, the well-faceted MOF crystal serves as a natural Fabry–Perot resonance cavity, leading to lasing around 640 nm when pumped with a 1064-nm pulse laser. This strategy not only combines the crystalline benefit of MOFs and luminescent behaviour of organic dyes but also creates a new synergistic two-photon-pumped lasing functionality, opening a new avenue for the future creation of solid-state photonic materials and devices. Two-photon-pumped dye lasers are useful for applications such as biological imaging; however, loss processes reduce their efficiency. Here, metal-organic frameworks, into which the laser dye is incorporated, demonstrate enhanced laser operation because losses such as dye aggregation-caused quenching are reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hong, Y., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15113d · Cited by 6,363
Cited by
Metal–organic framework composites
Zhu, Q.-L., & Xu, Q. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60472a · Cited by 2,286
MOF positioning technology and device fabrication
Falcaro, P., Ricco, R., Doherty, C. M., Liang, K., Hill, A. J., & Styles, M. J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00089g · Cited by 710
Carbon-Based Composite Phase Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage, Transfer, and Conversion
Chen, X., Cheng, P., Tang, Z., Xu, X., Gao, H., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202001274 · Cited by 483
Organic solid-state lasers: a materials view and future development
Jiang, Y., Liu, Y.-Y., Liu, X., Lin, H., Gao, K., Lai, W.-Y., & Huang, W. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00037j · Cited by 444
Organic Micro/Nanoscale Lasers
Zhang, W., Yao, J., & Zhao, Y. S. (2016) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00209 · Cited by 344
MOF based luminescence tuning and chemical/physical sensing
Müller-Buschbaum, K., Beuerle, F., & Feldmann, C. (2015) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.03.036 · Cited by 337
Chen, X., Gao, H., Yang, M., Xing, L., Dong, W., Li, A., Zheng, H., & Wang, G. (2019) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.015 · Cited by 149
Aparin, I. O., Melnychuk, N., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2020) · Advanced Optical Materials · doi:10.1002/adom.202000027 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Cui, Y., Xu, H., Yang, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, B., & Qian, G.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-10-30
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2719-2719
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030149323
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.