The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On-the-fly decoding luminescence lifetimes in the microsecond region for lanthanide-encoded suspension arrays
Open accessAbstract
Significant multiplexing capacity of optical time-domain coding has been recently demonstrated by tuning luminescence lifetimes of the upconversion nanoparticles called ‘τ-Dots’. It provides a large dynamic range of lifetimes from microseconds to milliseconds, which allows creating large libraries of nanotags/microcarriers. However, a robust approach is required to rapidly and accurately measure the luminescence lifetimes from the relatively slow-decaying signals. Here we show a fast algorithm suitable for the microsecond region with precision closely approaching the theoretical limit and compatible with the rapid scanning cytometry technique. We exploit this approach to further extend optical time-domain multiplexing to the downconversion luminescence, using luminescence microspheres wherein lifetimes are tuned through luminescence resonance energy transfer. We demonstrate real-time discrimination of these microspheres in the rapid scanning cytometry, and apply them to the multiplexed probing of pathogen DNA strands. Our results indicate that tunable luminescence lifetimes have considerable potential in high-throughput analytical sciences. Accurately determining luminescence lifetimes for slow-decaying signals can be challenging. Here, the authors report a fitting algorithm and subsequently experimentally show a method for the rapid measurement of luminescence lifetimes in the microsecond region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bendall, S. C., Simonds, E. F., Qiu, P., Amir, E.-A. D., Krutzik, P. O., Finck, R., Bruggner, R. V., Melamed, R., Trejo, A., Ornatsky, O. I., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198704 · Cited by 2,279
Cited by
Controlling upconversion nanocrystals for emerging applications
Zhou, B., Shi, B., Jin, D., & Liu, X. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.251 · Cited by 1,503
Self-citationZheng, W., Huang, P., Tu, D., Ma, E., Zhu, H., & Chen, X. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00178h · Cited by 894
Liu, X., Wang, Y., Li, X., Yi, Z., Deng, R., Liang, L., Xie, X., Loong, D. T. B., Song, S., Fan, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00916-7 · Cited by 386
Zhou, L., Wang, R., Yao, C., Li, X., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Xu, C., Zeng, A., Zhao, D., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7938 · Cited by 321
Leng, Y., Sun, K., Chen, X., & Li, W. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00382a · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Lu, J., Zhao, J., Cusido, J., Raymo, F. M., Yuan, J., Yang, S., Leif, R. C., Huo, Y., Piper, J. A., Paul Robinson, J., Goldys, E. M., & Jin, D.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-05-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3741-3741
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055480636
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.