The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A generalized non-local optical response theory for plasmonic nanostructures
Open accessAbstract
Metallic nanostructures exhibit a multitude of optical resonances associated with localized surface plasmon excitations. Recent observations of plasmonic phenomena at the sub-nanometre to atomic scale have stimulated the development of various sophisticated theoretical approaches for their description. Here instead we present a comparatively simple semiclassical generalized non-local optical response theory that unifies quantum pressure convection effects and induced charge diffusion kinetics, with a concomitant complex-valued generalized non-local optical response parameter. Our theory explains surprisingly well both the frequency shifts and size-dependent damping in individual metallic nanoparticles as well as the observed broadening of the crossover regime from bonding-dipole plasmons to charge-transfer plasmons in metal nanoparticle dimers, thus unravelling a classical broadening mechanism that even dominates the widely anticipated short circuiting by quantum tunnelling. We anticipate that our theory can be successfully applied in plasmonics to a wide class of conducting media, including doped semiconductors and low-dimensional materials such as graphene. As plasmonic structures shrink towards sub-nanometre scales, it becomes more important to develop theoretical tools to explain their optical properties. Towards this aim, the authors present a semiclassical approach to describe experimental results for the non-local optical response of nanostructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems
Datta, S. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805776 · Cited by 7,704
Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit
Gramotnev, D. K., & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.282 · Cited by 3,903
Self-citationRandom-matrix theory of quantum transport
Beenakker, C. W. J. (1997) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69.731 · Cited by 2,551
Tame, M. S., McEnery, K. R., Özdemir, Ş. K., Lee, J., Maier, S. A., & Kim, M. S. (2013) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2615 · Cited by 1,573
Cited by
How to deal with the loss in plasmonics and metamaterials
Khurgin, J. B. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.310 · Cited by 1,125
Quantum mechanical effects in plasmonic structures with subnanometre gaps
Zhu, W., Esteban, R., Borisov, A. G., Baumberg, J. J., Nordlander, P., Lezec, H. J., Aizpurua, J., & Crozier, K. B. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11495 · Cited by 820
Nonlocal optical response in metallic nanostructures
Raza, S., Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Wubs, M., & Asger Mortensen, N. (2015) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/27/18/183204 · Cited by 435
Self-citationCampos, A., Troc, N., Cottancin, E., Pellarin, M., Weissker, H.-C., Lermé, J., Kociak, M., & Hillenkamp, M. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0345-z · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, N. A., Raza, S., Wubs, M., Søndergaard, T., & Bozhevolnyi, S. I.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-05-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3809-3809
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160741150
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalized non-local optical response theory for plasmonic nanostructures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms4809
- The paper
- Mortensen, N. A., Raza, S., Wubs, M., Søndergaard, T., & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. (2014). A generalized non-local optical response theory for plasmonic nanostructures. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.