The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dirac cones and Dirac saddle points of bright excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides
Open accessAbstract
In monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, tightly bound excitons have been discovered with a valley pseudospin optically addressable through polarization selection rules. Here, we show that this valley pseudospin is strongly coupled to the exciton centre-of-mass motion through electron-hole exchange. This coupling realizes a massless Dirac cone with chirality index I=2 for excitons inside the light cone, that is, bright excitons. Under moderate strain, the I=2 Dirac cone splits into two degenerate I=1 Dirac cones, and saddle points with a linear Dirac spectrum emerge. After binding an extra electron, the charged exciton becomes a massive Dirac particle associated with a large valley Hall effect protected from intervalley scattering. Our results point to unique opportunities to study Dirac physics, with exciton’s optical addressability at specifiable momentum, energy and pseudospin. The strain-tunable valley-orbit coupling also implies new structures of exciton condensates, new functionalities of excitonic circuits and mechanical control of valley pseudospin. It has been show that monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides exhibit tightly bound excitons with a valley pseudospin that can be optically addressed by polarization selection rules. Here, the authors show the valley pseudospin is strongly coupled to the exciton centre-of-mass motion through electron-hole exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
Topological insulators and superconductors
Qi, X.-L., & Zhang, S.-C. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1057 · Cited by 14,394
Direct Observation of Dirac Cones and a Flatband in a Honeycomb Lattice for Polaritons
Jacqmin, T., Carusotto, I., Sagnes, I., Abbarchi, M., Solnyshkov, D. D., Malpuech, G., Galopin, E., Lemaître, A., Bloch, J., & Amo, A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.116402 · Cited by 509
Cited by
Schaibley, J. R., Yu, H., Clark, G., Rivera, P., Ross, J. S., Seyler, K. L., Yao, W., & Xu, X. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.55 · Cited by 2,652
Self-citationObservation of moiré excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices
Jin, C., Regan, E. C., Yan, A., Iqbal Bakti Utama, M., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Qin, Y., Yang, S., Zheng, Z., Shi, S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0976-y · Cited by 1,157
Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors
He, Y.-M., Clark, G., Schaibley, J. R., He, Y., Chen, M.-C., Wei, Y.-J., Ding, X., Zhang, Q., Yao, W., Xu, X., et al. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.75 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationLiu, G.-B., Xiao, D., Yao, Y., Xu, X., & Yao, W. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00301b · Cited by 698
Self-citationDirect measurement of exciton valley coherence in monolayer WSe2
Hao, K., Moody, G., Wu, F., Dass, C. K., Xu, L., Chen, C.-H., Sun, L., Li, M.-Y., Li, L.-J., MacDonald, A. H., et al. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3674 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., Liu, G.-B., Gong, P., Xu, X., & Yao, W.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-05-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3876-3876
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020511034
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.